Generic effectiveness measures: Sensitivity to symptom change in anxiety disorders

被引:47
作者
Perini, SJ [1 ]
Slade, T [1 ]
Andrews, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, St Vincents Hosp, Clin Res Unit Anxiety & Depress CRUFAD, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
关键词
anxiety; disability; WHODAS II; sensitivity;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2005.10.011
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare a newly developed screening measure of disability, the WHODAS II, to three established generic effectiveness measures in terms of its sensitivity to symptom change in people with anxiety disorders. Method: Patients who had undergone treatment for social phobia or panic disorder/agoraphobia at an anxiety disorders clinic were administered generic effectiveness measures and symptom measures before and after treatment. The design was naturalistic and observational. Data analysis included correlations between generic effectiveness and symptom measures; and effect size calculations regarding the ability of each generic effectiveness measure to discriminate between patients whose symptoms improved and patients whose symptoms did not improve over the course of treatment. Results: The WHODAS II was consistently the most sensitive generic effectiveness measure in its capacity to detect symptom changes in patients with social phobia. The SF-12 and K-10 also showed moderate sensitivity to symptom change. In the sample of patients with panic disorder/agoraphobia, the SF-12 was the most sensitive measure overall, closely followed by the K-10 and WHODAS II. The NCS Disability Days were the least sensitive to symptom change in both samples. Conclusion: The WHODAS II is at least as sensitive as other generic effectiveness measures to anxiety symptom changes, and is particularly sensitive to changes in social anxiety symptoms. It may prove to be a valuable measurement tool for informing public health policy in relation to anxiety disorders. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 130
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Utilising survey data to inform public policy: Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of treatment of ten mental disorders [J].
Andrews, G ;
Issakidis, C ;
Sanderson, K ;
Corry, J ;
Lapsley, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 184 :526-533
[2]   Cost-effectiveness of current and optimal treatment for schizophrenia [J].
Andrews, G ;
Sanderson, K ;
Corry, J ;
Issakidis, C ;
Lapsley, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 183 :427-435
[3]  
ANDREWS G, IN PRESS J RHEUMATOL
[4]  
Andrews G, 1994, TREATMENT ANXIETY DI
[5]   Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample [J].
Antony, MM ;
Bieling, PJ ;
Cox, BJ ;
Enns, MW ;
Swinson, RP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1998, 10 (02) :176-181
[6]   Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical samples [J].
Brown, TA ;
Chorpita, BF ;
Korotitsch, W ;
Barlow, DH .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1997, 35 (01) :79-89
[7]   COGNITIVE THERAPY OF ANXIETY DISORDERS [J].
CHAMBLESS, DL ;
GILLIS, MM .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 61 (02) :248-260
[8]   FEAR OF FEAR AND THE ANXIETY DISORDERS [J].
CHAMBLESS, DL ;
GRACELY, EJ .
COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 1989, 13 (01) :9-20
[9]   ASSESSMENT OF FEAR OF FEAR IN AGORAPHOBICS - THE BODY SENSATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE AND THE AGORAPHOBIC COGNITIONS QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
CHAMBLESS, DL ;
CAPUTO, GC ;
BRIGHT, P ;
GALLAGHER, R .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 52 (06) :1090-1097
[10]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysisfor the Behavioral Sciences, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-179060-8.50006-2