Organizational change and the dynamics of innovation: Formal R&D structure and intrafirm inventor networks

被引:55
作者
Argyres, Nicholas [1 ]
Rios, Luis A. [2 ]
Silverman, Brian S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Olin Sch Business, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch Business, 3620 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Toronto, Rotman Sch Management, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
innovation; organizational structure; R&D; social networks; INTERFIRM COLLABORATION; KNOWLEDGE; FIRM; CAPABILITIES; EVOLUTION; IMPACT; PARADOX; MARKET; TIES;
D O I
10.1002/smj.3217
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research Prior research has argued and shown that firms with more centralized R&D produce broader innovations, but the organizational mechanisms underlying this relationship are underexplored. This gap limits our understanding of whether and how formal R&D structure can be used as a lever to influence research outcomes. To address this question, we study the relationship between formal R&D structure, internal inventor networks, and innovative behavior and outcomes. We find that centralization of R&D budget authority increases the connectedness of internal inventor networks, which in turn increases the breadth of both innovation impact and technological search. Surprisingly, decentralization does not have the opposite effect. Our results suggest that changes in formal structure influence innovation outcomes through changes in inventor networks, with a lag reflecting organizational inertia. Managerial Diversified corporations can organize their R&D functions to be more or less centralized. Prior research has shown that this organizational choice is associated with different types of innovative outcomes. But what happens when a corporation changes its level of R&D centralization? This paper suggests that centralization of R&D gradually leads to new patterns of collaboration among inventors, which in turn will be associated with innovations that draw on and influence a wider range of technologies. However, future work is needed to understand why decentralization does not appear to have the opposite effect.
引用
收藏
页码:2015 / 2049
页数:35
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Abadie A., 2001, STATA J, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.1177/1536867X0400400307
[2]   How do spatial and social proximity influence knowledge flows? Evidence from patent data [J].
Agrawal, Ajay ;
Kapur, Devesh ;
McHale, John .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2008, 64 (02) :258-269
[3]   Introduction to the Special Issue: The Genesis and Dynamics of Organizational Networks [J].
Ahuja, Gautam ;
Soda, Giuseppe ;
Zaheer, Akbar .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2012, 23 (02) :434-448
[4]   THE STRUCTURAL EVOLUTION OF MULTIPLEX ORGANIZATIONAL NETWORKS: RESEARCH AND COMMERCE IN BIOTECHNOLOGY [J].
Amburgey, Terry L. ;
Al-Laham, Andreas ;
Tzabbar, Danny ;
Aharonson, Barak .
NETWORK STRATEGY, 2008, 25 :171-209
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Competing by Design: The Power of Organizational Architecture
[6]  
Argyres N, 1996, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V17, P395, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199605)17:5<395::AID-SMJ826>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-E
[8]   R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge [J].
Argyres, NS ;
Silverman, BS .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (8-9) :929-958
[9]   MAKE, BUY, ORGANIZE: THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN RESEARCH, EXTERNAL KNOWLEDGE, AND FIRM STRUCTURE [J].
Arora, Ashish ;
Belenzon, Sharon ;
Rios, Luis A. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (03) :317-337
[10]   Text matching to measure patent similarity [J].
Arts, Sam ;
Cassiman, Bruno ;
Carlos Gomez, Juan .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2018, 39 (01) :62-84