Production, review, and impact of technical quality control guidelines in a national context

被引:15
|
作者
Nielsen, Michelle K. [1 ]
Malkoske, Kyle E. [2 ]
Brown, Erika [3 ]
Diamond, Kevin [4 ,5 ]
Freniere, Normand [6 ]
Grant, John [7 ,8 ]
Pomerleau-Dalcourt, Natalie [9 ]
Schella, Jason [7 ,10 ]
Schreiner, L. John [11 ]
Tantot, Laurent [12 ]
Villarreal-Barajas, J. Eduardo [13 ,14 ]
Bissonnette, Jean-Pierre [15 ,16 ]
机构
[1] Trillium Hlth Partners, Mississauga Halton Cent West Reg Canc Program, Dept Med Phys, Mississauga, ON, Canada
[2] Royal Victoria Reg Hlth Ctr, Simcoe Muskoka Reg Canc Program, Radiat Treatment Program, Barrie, ON, Canada
[3] Canadian Partnership Qual Radiotherapy, Red Deer, AB, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Sch Interdisciplinary Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] Juravinski Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] Ctr Hosp Affilie Univ Reg, Ctr Integre Univ Sante & Serv Sociaux Mauricie &, Dept Radio Oncol, Trois Rivieres, PQ, Canada
[7] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Halifax, NS, Canada
[8] Nova Scotia Hlth Author, Cape Breton Canc Ctr, Sydney, NS, Canada
[9] Reseau Sante Vitalite, Ctr Oncol Dr Leon Richard, Dept Phys Med, Moncton, NB, Canada
[10] Nova Scotia Hlth Author, QEII Hlth Sci Ctr, Med Phys Team, Halifax, NS, Canada
[11] Kingston Gen Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Canc Ctr Southeastern Ontario, Kingston, ON, Canada
[12] Hop Maison Neuve Rosemont, Dept Radio Oncol, Ctr Integre Univ Sante & Serv Sociaux Est Ile Mon, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[13] Univ Calgary, Dept Oncol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[14] Tom Baker Canc Clin, Dept Med Phys, Calgary, AB, Canada
[15] Univ Toronto, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[16] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, 610 Univ Ave 5-968A, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2016年 / 17卷 / 06期
关键词
quality assurance; quality control; radiotherapy; workload; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6422
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A close partnership between the Canadian Partnership for Quality Radiotherapy (CPQR) and the Canadian Organization of Medical Physicist's (COMP) Quality Assurance and Radiation Safety Advisory Committee (QARSAC) has resulted in the development of a suite of Technical Quality Control (TQC) guidelines for radiation treatment equipment; they outline specific performance objectives and criteria that equipment should meet in order to assure an acceptable level of radiation treatment quality. The adopted framework for the development and maintenance of the TQCs ensures the guidelines incorporate input from the medical physics community during development, measures the workload required to perform the QC tests outlined in each TQC, and remain relevant (i.e., "living documents") through subsequent planned reviews and updates. The framework includes consolidation of existing guidelines and/or literature by expert reviewers, structured stages of public review, external field-testing, and ratification by COMP. This TQC development framework is a cross-country initiative that allows for rapid development of robust, community-driven living guideline documents that are owned by the community and reviewed to keep relevant in a rapidly evolving technical environment. Community engagement and uptake survey data shows 70% of Canadian centers are part of this process and that the data in the guideline documents reflect, and are influencing, the way Canadian radiation treatment centers run their technical quality control programs. For a medium-sized center comprising six linear accelerators and a comprehensive brachytherapy program, we evaluate the physics workload to 1.5 full-time equivalent physicists per year to complete all QC tests listed in this suite.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 15
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMP report: CPQR technical quality control guidelines for treatment planning systems
    Villarreal-Barajas, Jose E.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (02): : 35 - 38
  • [2] COMP report: CPQR technical quality control guidelines for kilovoltage X ray radiotherapy machines
    Furstoss, Christophe
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (02): : 18 - 21
  • [3] COMP report: CPQR technical quality control guidelines for low-dose-rate permanent seed brachytherapy
    Beaulieu, Luc
    Radford, Dee-Ann
    Eduardo Villarreal-Barajas, J.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (03): : 13 - 18
  • [4] COMP Report: CPQR technical quality control guidelines for use of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in radiation treatment planning
    Klein, Ran
    Oliver, Mike
    La Russa, Dan
    Agapito, John
    Gaede, Stewart
    Bissonnette, JeanPierre
    Rahmim, Arman
    Uribe, Carlos
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 23 (12):
  • [5] COMP report: CPQR technical quality control guidelines for major dosimetry equipment
    Kamta, Gerard Lagmago
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (04): : 18 - 25
  • [6] COMP report: CPQR technical quality control guidelines for Gamma Knife radiosurgery
    Berndt, Anita
    van Prooijen, Monique
    Guillot, Mathieu
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (05): : 365 - 367
  • [7] COMP Report: CPQR technical quality control guidelines for conventional radiotherapy simulators
    Bertrand, Marie-Joelle
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (04): : 13 - 17
  • [8] COMP report: CPQR technical quality control guidelines for radiation treatment centers
    Malkoske, Kyle E.
    Nielsen, Michelle K.
    Tantot, Laurent
    Pomerleau-Dalcourt, Natalie
    Milette, Marie-Pierre
    Diamond, Kevin R.
    Freniere, Normand
    Bertrand, Marie-Joelle
    Villarreal-Barajas, J. Eduardo
    Sasaki, David K.
    Schella, Jason
    Grant, John
    Schreiner, L. John
    Bissonnette, Jean-Pierre
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (02): : 44 - 47
  • [9] Impact of quality control on production system performance
    Colledani, M.
    Tolio, T.
    CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 55 (01) : 453 - 456
  • [10] Cervical screening in the UK and laboratory quality control in the context of the 2007 European guidelines
    Herbert, Amanda
    COLLEGIUM ANTROPOLOGICUM, 2007, 31 : 41 - 46