Evaluation and improvement of the default soil hydraulic parameters for the Noah Land Surface Model

被引:40
|
作者
Kishne, Andrea Sz. [1 ]
Yimam, Yohannes Tadesse [1 ]
Morgan, Cristine L. S. [1 ]
Dornblaser, Bright C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Soil & Crop Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas Commiss Environm Qual, Air Qual Div, Austin, TX 78711 USA
关键词
Noah land surface model; Soil hydraulic parameter; Pedotransfer function; Soil moisture; WATER-FLOW; MOISTURE; SENSITIVITY; SIMULATION; IMPLEMENTATION; CONDUCTIVITY; FLUXES; MM5;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.09.022
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Soil hydraulic parameters used in estimating soil water and energy fluxes are included in a lookup table in the Noah Land Surface Model (ISM). The purpose of the study was to examine the Noah default soil hydraulic parameters and compare them to soil measurements across Texas, USA. These default soil parameters were compared to measured soil properties from a soil database including 6749 soil samples located within and around Texas. Mean differences between measured and default soil parameters were tested using a t-test (alpha = 0.05). To assess the proposed changes to default soil parameters, water retention curves were created using updated parameters and compared to measured soil moisture content at field capacity (theta(fc)) and permanent wilting point (theta(wp)). Spatial trends across major land resource areas in Texas were also demonstrated for water retention parameters. Our findings indicate that 95% of the default soil parameters were significantly different from the region-specific measured values. Measured soil water content at air-dry, theta(wp), and theta(fc) are better replacements than default values. Consequent changes in theta(wp) and theta(fc) yielded a 35 to 76% decrease in plant available water compared to default Updated water retention curves showed improved agreement between estimated soil water and measured values in 95% of cases. For three texture classes, the standard deviations of parameters for water retention parameters ranged 30% for the slope of the water retention curve and 65% for saturated hydraulic conductivity. These results indicate the importance of accounting for spatial variability of soil parameters rather than combining these parameters into texture classes alone. The revised parameter table improves modeling of soil hydraulic properties. Ultimately spatially distributed databases of hydraulic soil parameters will better capture variability and spatial structure of soil processes modeled by Noah LSM. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 259
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Estimation of soil hydraulic parameters for different land-uses
    Fashi F.H.
    Gorji M.
    Shorafa M.
    Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2016, 2 (4) : 1 - 7
  • [42] Evaluation of the Effects of Soil Layer Classification in the Common Land Model on Modeled Surface Variables and the Associated Land Surface Soil Moisture Retrieval Model
    Leng, Pei
    Song, Xiaoning
    Li, Zhao-Liang
    Wang, Yawei
    REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 5 (11) : 5514 - 5529
  • [43] EVALUATION OF LAND-USE EFFECTS ON SURFACE SOIL HYDRAULIC-PROPERTIES USING CREAMS
    RUDRA, RP
    DICKINSON, WT
    WALL, GJ
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1989, 32 (04): : 1295 - 1302
  • [44] Enhancing Noah Land Surface Model Prediction Skill over Indian Subcontinent by Assimilating SMOPS Blended Soil Moisture
    Nair, Akhilesh S.
    Indu, J.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 8 (12):
  • [45] Noah-MP-Crop: Introducing dynamic crop growth in the Noah-MP land surface model
    Liu, Xing
    Chen, Fei
    Barlage, Michael
    Zhou, Guangsheng
    Niyogi, Dev
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2016, 121 (23) : 13953 - 13972
  • [46] Parameter Sensitivity of the Noah-MP Land Surface Model with Dynamic Vegetation
    Arsenault, Kristi R.
    Nearing, Grey S.
    Wang, Shugong
    Yatheendradas, Soni
    Peters-Lidard, Christa D.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2018, 19 (05) : 815 - 830
  • [47] Evaluating a New Deposition Velocity Module in the Noah Land-Surface Model
    Charusombat, U.
    Niyogi, D.
    Kumar, A.
    Wang, X.
    Chen, F.
    Guenther, A.
    Turnipseed, A.
    Alapaty, K.
    BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2010, 137 (02) : 271 - 290
  • [48] Evaluating a New Deposition Velocity Module in the Noah Land-Surface Model
    U. Charusombat
    D. Niyogi
    A. Kumar
    X. Wang
    F. Chen
    A. Guenther
    A. Turnipseed
    K. Alapaty
    Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2010, 137 : 271 - 290
  • [49] An Application of the Maximum Entropy Production Method in the WRF Noah Land Surface Model
    Jia, Chunhui
    Zhao, Ping
    Wang, Jingfeng
    Deng, Yi
    Li, Na
    Wang, Yingchun
    Miao, Shiguang
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2023, 128 (05)
  • [50] A comparison of land surface model soil hydraulic properties estimated by inverse modeling and pedotransfer functions
    Gutmann, Ethan D.
    Small, Eric E.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2007, 43 (05)