Evaluation and improvement of the default soil hydraulic parameters for the Noah Land Surface Model

被引:40
|
作者
Kishne, Andrea Sz. [1 ]
Yimam, Yohannes Tadesse [1 ]
Morgan, Cristine L. S. [1 ]
Dornblaser, Bright C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Soil & Crop Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas Commiss Environm Qual, Air Qual Div, Austin, TX 78711 USA
关键词
Noah land surface model; Soil hydraulic parameter; Pedotransfer function; Soil moisture; WATER-FLOW; MOISTURE; SENSITIVITY; SIMULATION; IMPLEMENTATION; CONDUCTIVITY; FLUXES; MM5;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.09.022
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Soil hydraulic parameters used in estimating soil water and energy fluxes are included in a lookup table in the Noah Land Surface Model (ISM). The purpose of the study was to examine the Noah default soil hydraulic parameters and compare them to soil measurements across Texas, USA. These default soil parameters were compared to measured soil properties from a soil database including 6749 soil samples located within and around Texas. Mean differences between measured and default soil parameters were tested using a t-test (alpha = 0.05). To assess the proposed changes to default soil parameters, water retention curves were created using updated parameters and compared to measured soil moisture content at field capacity (theta(fc)) and permanent wilting point (theta(wp)). Spatial trends across major land resource areas in Texas were also demonstrated for water retention parameters. Our findings indicate that 95% of the default soil parameters were significantly different from the region-specific measured values. Measured soil water content at air-dry, theta(wp), and theta(fc) are better replacements than default values. Consequent changes in theta(wp) and theta(fc) yielded a 35 to 76% decrease in plant available water compared to default Updated water retention curves showed improved agreement between estimated soil water and measured values in 95% of cases. For three texture classes, the standard deviations of parameters for water retention parameters ranged 30% for the slope of the water retention curve and 65% for saturated hydraulic conductivity. These results indicate the importance of accounting for spatial variability of soil parameters rather than combining these parameters into texture classes alone. The revised parameter table improves modeling of soil hydraulic properties. Ultimately spatially distributed databases of hydraulic soil parameters will better capture variability and spatial structure of soil processes modeled by Noah LSM. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 259
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Incorporating hydraulic lift into a land surface model and its effects on surface soil moisture prediction
    Ren, DD
    Xue, M
    Henderson-Sellers, A
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2004, 5 (06) : 1181 - 1191
  • [32] Evaluation of Noah land-surface models in predicting soil temperature and moisture at two tropical sites in India
    Bhattacharya, Anwesha
    Mandal, Manabottam
    METEOROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2015, 22 (03) : 505 - 512
  • [33] Joint assimilation of satellite-based surface soil moisture and vegetation conditions into the Noah-MP land surface model
    Heyvaert, Zdenko
    Scherrer, Samuel
    Dorigo, Wouter
    Bechtold, Michel
    De Lannoy, Gabrielle
    SCIENCE OF REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 9
  • [34] Development of a China Dataset of Soil Hydraulic Parameters Using Pedotransfer Functions for Land Surface Modeling
    Dai, Yongjiu
    Shangguan, Wei
    Duan, Qingyun
    Liu, Baoyuan
    Fu, Suhua
    Niu, Guoyue
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2013, 14 (03) : 869 - 887
  • [35] The impact of standard and hard-coded parameters on the hydrologic fluxes in the Noah-MP land surface model
    Cuntz, Matthias
    Mai, Juliane
    Samaniego, Luis
    Clark, Martyn
    Wulfmeyer, Volker
    Branch, Oliver
    Attinger, Sabine
    Thober, Stephan
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2016, 121 (18) : 10676 - 10700
  • [36] Sensitivity Analysis of the Noah-MP Land Surface Model for Soil Hydrothermal Simulations Over the Tibetan Plateau
    Hu, Wei
    Ma, Weiqiang
    Yang, Zong-Liang
    Ma, Yaoming
    Xie, Zhipeng
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [37] Uncertainty Quantification for the Noah-MP Land Surface Model: A Case Study in a Grassland and Sandy Soil Region
    Wang, Heng
    Huo, Xueli
    Duan, Qingyun
    Liu, Rui
    Luo, Shiwei
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2023, 128 (20)
  • [38] An Empirical Latent Heat Flux Parameterization for the Noah Land Surface Model
    Godfrey, Christopher M.
    Stensrud, David J.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2010, 49 (08) : 1696 - 1713
  • [39] Effects of organic soil in the Noah-MP land-surface model on simulated skin and soil temperature profiles and surface energy exchanges for China
    Zhang, Guo
    Chen, Yueli
    Li, Jianduo
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2021, 249
  • [40] Performance evaluation of methods for the estimation of soil hydraulic parameters and their suitability in a hydrologic model
    Islam, Nazrul
    Wallender, Wesley W.
    Mitchell, Jeffrey P.
    Wicks, Santhi
    Howitt, Richard E.
    GEODERMA, 2006, 134 (1-2) : 135 - 151