Comparative Study of Different Numerical Models for Vehicle-Bridge Interaction Analysis

被引:28
作者
Zou, Qiling [1 ]
Deng, Lu [2 ]
Guo, Tieding [1 ]
Yin, Xinfeng [3 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ, Key Lab Wind & Bridge Engn Hunan Prov, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Changsha Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Changsha 410004, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Vehicle-bridge interaction; numerical model; impact factor; dynamic load coefficient; road roughness; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC-RESPONSE; IMPACT; AMPLIFICATION; LOADS; BEAM; MASS;
D O I
10.1142/S0219455415500571
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this paper, a comprehensive comparative study on several existing vehicle-bridge interaction (VBI) models is presented with the aim to provide a useful reference to the selection of vehicle and bridge models when conducting the VBI simulation. A simply-supported slab-on-girder highway bridge and the AASHTO HS20-44 vehicle are adopted in the numerical analysis. The bridge is modeled as an Euler-Bernoulli beam, grillage, plate-and-beam system and solid-element system, respectively, while the vehicle is modeled as a moving-force, moving-mass and spring-damper-mass (SDM) system, respectively. Other factors, including the road roughness and the contact condition between the vehicle tire and bridge, are also considered. The effects of different VBI models on the bridge responses are studied and the results from different models are compared in terms of their accuracy, efficiency and suitability. The results show that the accuracy of different types of bridge responses calculated varies with the number of bridge vibration modes used in the simulation. It is also found that the type of element used in the bridge model and the vehicle tire model both have a larger impact on the bridge acceleration than bridge deflection.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ASCE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, LRFD BRIDG DES SPEC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, ISO 8608
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges
[5]   Impact study of cable-stayed bridge under railway traffic using various models [J].
Au, FTK ;
Wang, JJ ;
Cheung, YK .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2001, 240 (03) :447-465
[6]  
CHAN THT, 1990, J STRUCT ENG, V116, P1772
[7]   Disk model for wheels moving over highway bridges with rough surfaces [J].
Chang, K. C. ;
Wu, F. B. ;
Yang, Y. B. .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2011, 330 (20) :4930-4944
[8]  
Deng L, 2011, J VIB CONTROL, V17, P183, DOI [10.1177/1077546309351222, 10.1177/10775463093S1222]
[9]   State-of-the-Art Review of Dynamic Impact Factors of Highway Bridges [J].
Deng, Lu ;
Yu, Yang ;
Zou, Qiling ;
Cai, C. S. .
JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2015, 20 (05)
[10]   Development of dynamic impact factor for performance evaluation of existing multi-girder concrete bridges [J].
Deng, Lu ;
Cai, C. S. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2010, 32 (01) :21-31