Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques in patients with simulated difficult laryngoscopy using a rigid neck collar

被引:14
作者
Eschertzhuber, Stephan [2 ]
Brimacombe, Joseph [1 ]
Hohlrieder, Matthias [2 ]
Stadlbauer, Karl-Heinz [2 ]
Keller, Christian [3 ]
机构
[1] Cairns Base Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, The Esplanade, Cairns 4870, Australia
[2] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care Med, Innsbruck, Austria
[3] SchulthessKlin, Dept Anaesthesia, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1213/ane.0b013e31817f0def
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: We compared three techniques for insertion of the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal (TM) (PLMA) in patients with simulated difficult laryngoscopy using a rigid neck collar. METHODS: Ninety-nine anesthetized healthy female patients aged 19-68 yr were randomly allocated for PLMA insertion using the digital, introducer tool (IT) or guided techniques. Difficult laryngoscopy was simulated using a rigid neck collar. The laryngoscopic view was graded before PLMA insertion. The digital and IT techniques were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The guided technique involved priming the drain tube with an Eschmann tracheal tube introducer, placing the introducer in the esophagus under direct vision and railroading the PLMA into position. Failed insertion was defined by any of the following criteria: 1) failed pharyngeal placement, 2) malposition, and 3) ineffective ventilation. RESULTS: The median laryngoscopic view was 3 and the mean interincisor distance was 3.3 cm. Insertion was more frequently successful with the guided technique at the first attempt (guided 100%, digital 64%, IT 61%; P < 0.0001.), but success after three attempts was similar (guided 100%, digital 94%, IT 91%). The time taken for successful placement was similar among groups at the first attempt, but was shorter for the guided technique after three attempts (guided 31 +/- 8 s, digital 49 28 s, IT 54 +/- 37 s; P < 0.02). CONCLUSION: The guided insertion technique is more frequently successful than the digital or IT techniques in patients with simulated difficult laryngoscopy using a rigid neck collar.
引用
收藏
页码:1253 / 1256
页数:4
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Efficacy of the ProSeal® laryngeal mask airway during manual in-line stabilisation of the neck [J].
Asai, T ;
Murao, K ;
Shingu, K .
ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 57 (09) :918-920
[2]   Pressure in laryngeal mask airway cuffs [J].
Brain, AIJ .
ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 51 (06) :603-603
[3]   The LMA 'ProSeal' - a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent [J].
Brain, AIJ ;
Verghese, C ;
Strube, PJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 84 (05) :650-654
[4]   An unexpected complication of the intubating laryngeal mask [J].
Branthwaite, MA .
ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 54 (02) :166-167
[5]   The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway - A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients [J].
Brimacombe, J ;
Keller, C .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (01) :104-109
[6]   Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway [J].
Brimacombe, J ;
Keller, C .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2004, 32 (05) :681-684
[7]   Gum elastic Bongie-guided insetfion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques [J].
Brimacombe, J ;
Keller, C ;
Judd, DV .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 100 (01) :25-29
[8]   A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal™ and Classic™ laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients [J].
Brimacombe, J ;
Keller, C ;
Fullekrug, B ;
Agrò, F ;
Rosenblatt, W ;
Dierdorf, SF ;
de Lucas, EG ;
Capdevilla, X ;
Brimacombe, N .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 96 (02) :289-295
[9]   Stability of the LMA-ProSeal® and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions:: a randomized crossover study [J].
Brimacombe, J ;
Keller, C .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 20 (01) :65-69
[10]   A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway ProSealTM and the laryngeal tube airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation [J].
Brimacombe, J ;
Keller, C ;
Brimacombe, L .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 95 (03) :770-776