Diagnosis and Prioritization of Vulnerable Areas of Urban Ecosystem Regulation Services

被引:7
作者
Lee, Dongwoo [1 ]
Oh, Kyushik [2 ]
Suh, Jungeun [2 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Res Inst Spatial Planning & Policy, Seoul 04763, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Dept Urban Planning & Engn, Seoul 04763, South Korea
关键词
urban ecosystem regulation services; vulnerability diagnosis; hotspot analysis; spatial combinations; urban planning; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; EXTREME HEAT; HEALTH-RISK; CLIMATE; SUSTAINABILITY; URBANIZATION; MANAGEMENT; CITY; TEMPERATURE; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.3390/land11101804
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rapid urbanization and population growth have led to drastic degradation of urban ecosystem regulation services (ERS). Urgently needed is the identification of vulnerable areas where ERS are being intensively deteriorated, and preparation of measures to respond to them. This study developed a framework to diagnose and prioritize vulnerable areas of urban ERS. The vulnerability of urban ERS that include carbon storage capacity, flood-risk mitigation capacity, and heat stress reduction capacity was diagnosed with a resolution of 100 m x 100 m grid. Priority areas to improve urban ERS were delineated using hot spot analysis, and the diagnosed results of the urban ERS were categorized by eight combination types including exposure, sensitivity, and adaptability. The spatial and societal problems included in the priority areas were further investigated by overlaying hot spot areas with eight combination maps. Finally, spatial management measures for the priority areas were suggested based on the analysis results. From the detailed diagnosis results of the vulnerable ERS areas, this study provides a framework to link the concept of ERS vulnerability with urban planning. Furthermore, effective spatial planning guidelines can be prepared to improve urban ERS by spatially delineating priority areas to improve urban ERS vulnerability.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 89 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis, P155
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Ecosystem and human well-being. A framework for assessment
[5]   A Differentiated Spatial Assessment of Urban Ecosystem Services Based on Land Use Data in Halle, Germany [J].
Arnold, Janis ;
Kleemann, Janina ;
Fuerst, Christine .
LAND, 2018, 7 (03)
[6]   Net changes in regional woody vegetation cover and carbon storage in Texas Drylands, 1937-1999 [J].
Asner, GP ;
Archer, S ;
Hughes, RF ;
Ansley, RJ ;
Wessman, CA .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2003, 9 (03) :316-335
[7]  
Bae M., 2016, KOREA ENV POLICY, V24, P25, DOI [10.15301/jepa.2016.24.3.25, DOI 10.15301/JEPA.2016.24.3.25]
[8]   Flood vulnerability indices at varying spatial scales [J].
Balica, S. F. ;
Douben, N. ;
Wright, N. G. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 60 (10) :2571-2580
[9]   The hazards of indicators: Insights from the environmental vulnerability index [J].
Barnett, Jon ;
Lambert, Simon ;
Fry, Ian .
ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS, 2008, 98 (01) :102-119
[10]   Ecosystem service bundles along the urban-rural gradient: Insights for landscape planning and management [J].
Baro, Francesc ;
Gomez-Baggethun, Erik ;
Haase, Dagmar .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 24 :147-159