The Processing of Unexpected Positive Response Outcomes in the Mediofrontal Cortex

被引:150
作者
Ferdinand, Nicola K. [1 ]
Mecklinger, Axel [1 ]
Kray, Jutta [1 ]
Gehring, William J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saarland, Dept Psychol, D-66041 Saarbrucken, Germany
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
FEEDBACK-RELATED NEGATIVITY; ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; MEDIAL FRONTAL-CORTEX; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES; ERROR LIKELIHOOD; REWARD MAGNITUDE; P300; BRAIN; WORSE;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1410-12.2012
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The human mediofrontal cortex, especially the anterior cingulate cortex, is commonly assumed to contribute to higher cognitive functions like performance monitoring. How exactly this is achieved is currently the subject of lively debate but there is evidence that an event's valence and its expectancy play important roles. One prominent theory, the reinforcement learning theory by Holroyd and colleagues (2002, 2008), assigns a special role to feedback valence, while the prediction of response-outcome (PRO) model by Alexander and Brown (2010, 2011) claims that the mediofrontal cortex is sensitive to unexpected events regardless of their valence. However, paradigms examining this issue have included confounds that fail to separate valence and expectancy. In the present study, we tested the two competing theories of performance monitoring by using an experimental task that separates valence and unexpectedness of performance feedback. The feedback-related negativity of the event-related potential, which is commonly assumed to be a reflection of mediofrontal cortex activity, was elicited not only by unexpected negative feedback, but also by unexpected positive feedback. This implies that the mediofrontal cortex is sensitive to the unexpectedness of events in general rather than their valence and by this supports the PRO model.
引用
收藏
页码:12087 / 12092
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Anticipatory activity in anterior cingulate cortex can be independent of conflict and error likelihood [J].
Aarts, Esther ;
Roelofs, Ardi ;
Van Turennout, Miranda .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 28 (18) :4671-4678
[2]   Medial prefrontal cortex as an action-outcome predictor [J].
Alexander, William H. ;
Brown, Joshua W. .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 14 (10) :1338-U163
[3]   Computational Models of Performance Monitoring and Cognitive Control [J].
Alexander, William H. ;
Brown, Joshua W. .
TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2010, 2 (04) :658-677
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, OXFORD HDB EVENT REL, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780195374148.013.0120
[5]   Learning-related changes in reward expectancy are reflected in the feedback-related negativity [J].
Bellebaum, Christian ;
Daum, Irene .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 27 (07) :1823-1835
[6]   Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: Effects of frequency, inhibition and errors [J].
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Gray, JR ;
Molfese, DL ;
Snyder, A .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2001, 11 (09) :825-836
[7]   Reward expectation modulates feedback-related negativity and EEG spectra [J].
Cohen, Michael X. ;
Elger, Christian E. ;
Ranganath, Charan .
NEUROIMAGE, 2007, 35 (02) :968-978
[8]   IS THE P300 COMPONENT A MANIFESTATION OF CONTEXT UPDATING [J].
DONCHIN, E ;
COLES, MGH .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1988, 11 (03) :357-374
[9]   Mediofrontal negativities to averted gains and losses in the slot-machine task - A further investigation [J].
Donkers, FCL ;
van Boxtel, GJM .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (04) :256-262
[10]   Better or worse than expected? Aging, learning, and the ERN [J].
Eppinger, Ben ;
Kray, Jutta ;
Mock, Barbara ;
Mecklinger, Axel .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2008, 46 (02) :521-539