Experimental verification of seismic vibration control using a semi-active friction tuned mass damper

被引:45
作者
Lin, Ging-Long [1 ]
Lin, Chi-Chang [1 ]
Lu, Lyan-Ywan [2 ]
Ho, Yu-Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
[2] Natl Kaohsiung First Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Construct Engn, Kaohsiung 824, Taiwan
关键词
experimental study; seismic control; semi-active control; shaking table test; tuned mass damper (TMD); variable friction; ENERGY-DISSIPATION; BUILDING COMPLEX; OPTIMUM DESIGN; PROTECTION; SYSTEMS; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1002/eqe.1162
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A tuned mass damper (TMD) system consists of an added mass with properly functioning spring and damping elements for providing frequency-dependent damping in a primary structure. The advantage of a friction-type TMD, that is, a nonlinear TMD, is its energy dissipation via a friction mechanism. In contrast, the disadvantages of a passive friction TMD (PF-TMD) are its fixed and predetermined slip load and loss of tuning and energy dissipation capabilities when it is in a stick state. A semi-active friction TMD (SAF-TMD) is used to overcome these disadvantages. The SAF-TMD can adjust its slip force in response to structure motion. To verify its feasibility, a prototype SAF-TMD was fabricated and tested dynamically using a shaking table test. A nonsticking friction control law was used to keep the SAF-TMD activated and in a slip state in earthquakes at varying intensities. The shaking table test results demonstrated that: (i) the experimental results are consistent with the theoretical results; (ii) the SAF-TMD is more effective than the PF-TMD given a similar peak TMD stroke; and (iii) the SAF-TMD can also prevent a residual TMD stroke in a PF-TMD system. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:813 / 830
页数:18
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Abe M, 1996, EARTHQUAKE ENG STRUC, V25, P743, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199607)25:7<743::AID-EQE579>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-S
[3]   Optimal control of structures with semiactive-tuned mass dampers [J].
Aldemir, U .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2003, 266 (04) :847-874
[4]   A bidirectional and homogeneous tuned mass damper:: A new device for passive control of vibrations [J].
Almazan, Jose L. ;
De la Llera, Juan C. ;
Inaudi, Jose A. ;
Lopez-Garcia, Diego ;
Izquierdo, Luis E. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2007, 29 (07) :1548-1560
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1947, Mechanical vibrations
[6]   Optimum parameters of tuned mass damper for damped main system [J].
Bakre, S. V. ;
Jangid, R. S. .
STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2007, 14 (03) :448-470
[7]   Experimental study on adjustable tuned mass damper to reduce floor vibration due to machinery [J].
Chang, Min-Li ;
Lin, Chi-Chang ;
Ueng, Jin-Min ;
Hsieh, Kai-Hsiang ;
Wang, Jer-Fu .
STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2010, 17 (05) :532-548
[8]   Semiactive control of the 20-story benchmark building with piezoelectric friction dampers [J].
Chen, GD ;
Chen, CQ .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2004, 130 (04) :393-400
[9]   Performance enhancement of bridge infrastructure systems: Long-span bridge, moving trucks and wind with tuned mass dampers [J].
Chen, S. R. ;
Wu, J. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2008, 30 (11) :3316-3324
[10]   Semi-active tuned mass damper building systems: Application [J].
Chey, Min-Ho ;
Chase, J. Geoffrey ;
Mander, John B. ;
Carr, Athol J. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2010, 39 (01) :69-89