Peer-Review and Rejection Causes in Submitting Original Medical Manuscripts

被引:5
作者
Mendiola Pastrana, Indira Rocio [1 ]
Vargas Hernandez, Adriana [2 ]
Perez Manjarrez, Francia Estefania [2 ]
Ortiz Lopez, Eduardo [3 ]
Fernanda Romero-Henriquez, Luisa [4 ]
Lopez-Ortiz, Geovani [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Ctr Invest Polit Poblac & Salud CIPPS, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Fac Med, Subdivis Med Familiar, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[3] Univ Oxford, Summer Internship Program, Nuffield Dept Med, Oxford, England
[4] Acad Social Sci, Acad Board CAMDF CA 1 Educ Inequal & Profess Prac, Ctr Actualizac Magisterio Mexico City, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
关键词
research; medical writing; manuscript; peer-review; rejection; COMMON ERRORS; SCIENCE; VACCINE; REFUSAL;
D O I
10.1097/CEH.0000000000000295
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of specialized medical journals is to accurately disseminate the results of new research. The peer-review process is crucial for journals to be able to fulfill this purpose. Although the peer-review determines whether scientific papers are accepted or rejected for publication, for many authors is a not well known process in its entirety. Many journals have focused on educating their audience about how and what is assessed during peer-review, nevertheless, the rate of manuscripts rejected because of easily-avoidable causes related to this, remains high. In this paper, we describe the process that specialized journals use to assess original medical manuscripts and list the main causes of paper rejection. Practicing physicians and medical students who wish to report their research results stand to benefit if they can identify and early avoid on the issues that most often arise during the peer-review process.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 186
页数:5
相关论文
共 46 条
[11]   Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers? [J].
D'Andrea, Rafael ;
O'Dwyer, James P. .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (10)
[12]   Some consequences of refusing to participate in peer review [J].
Dacso, Clifford C. .
IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine, 2014, 2
[13]  
Dinis-Oliveira Ricardo Jorge, 2015, F1000Res, V4, P419, DOI 10.12688/f1000research.6809.2
[14]   The need for speed: the peer-review process and what are we doing about it? [J].
Epstein, Diana ;
Wiseman, Virginia ;
Salaria, Natasha ;
Mounier-Jack, Sandra .
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2017, 32 (10) :1345-1346
[15]   Common errors in manuscripts submitted to medical science journals [J].
Ezeala, C. C. ;
Nweke, I. N. ;
Ezeala, M. O. .
ANNALS OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH, 2013, 3 (03) :376-379
[16]   Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study [J].
Glonti, Ketevan ;
Hren, Darko .
BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (10)
[17]   WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): Presenting scientific work (Publication with Expression of Concern) [J].
Grech, Victor .
EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 125 :49-50
[18]  
Grindstaff TL, 2012, INT J SPORTS PHYS TH, V7, P518
[19]   Scientific Research Problems with peer review [J].
Henderson, Mark .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 340 :c1409
[20]   Reasons for Manuscript Rejection After Peer Review From the Journal Headache [J].
Hesterman, Chelsea M. ;
Szperka, Christina L. ;
Turner, Dana P. .
HEADACHE, 2018, 58 (10) :1511-1518