Nature Prescriptions for Health: A Review of Evidence and Research Opportunities

被引:87
作者
Kondo, Michelle C. [1 ]
Oyekanmi, Kehinde O. [1 ,2 ]
Gibson, Allison [3 ]
South, Eugenia C. [2 ]
Bocarro, Jason [4 ]
Hipp, J. Aaron [4 ]
机构
[1] US Forest Serv, USDA, Northern Res Stn, 100 North 20th St,Ste 205, Philadelphia, PA 19103 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Emergency Med, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Schuylkill Ctr Environm Educ, 8480 Hagys Mill Rd, Philadelphia, PA 19128 USA
[4] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Pk Recreat & Tourism Management, Coll Nat Resources, Box 8004,3028F Biltmore Hall, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
nature prescriptions; NatureRx; ParksRx; narrative review; outdoor recreation; HORTICULTURAL THERAPY; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; CHRONIC DISEASE; MENTAL-HEALTH; PROGRAM; INTERVENTION; OUTDOORS; EXPOSURE; CHILDREN; ADULTS;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph17124213
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nature prescription programs have emerged to address the high burden of chronic disease and increasingly sedentary and screen-based lifestyles. This study examines the base of evidence regarding such programs. We conducted a narrative review of published literature using four electronic databases. We included case studies, research design articles, and empirical studies that discussed any type of outdoor exposure or activities initiated by a health-care provider from an outpatient clinic. We examined articles for information on target populations, health outcomes, and structural and procedural elements. We also summarized evidence of the effectiveness of nature prescription programs, and discussed needs and challenges for both practice and research. Eleven studies, including eight empirical studies, have evaluated nature prescription programs with either structured or unstructured formats, referring patients either to nearby parks or to formal outdoor activity programs. Empirical studies evaluate a wide variety of health behaviors and outcomes among the most at-risk children and families. Research is too sparse to draw patterns in health outcome responses. Studies largely tested program structures to increase adherence, or patient follow-through, however findings were mixed. Three published studies explore providers' perspectives. More research is necessary to understand how to measure and increase patient adherence, short and long-term health outcomes for patients and their families, and determinants of provider participation and participation impacts on providers' own health.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:15
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
ACKLEY D, 1987, J REHABIL, V53, P70
[2]   Nature-assisted therapy: Systematic review of controlled and observational studies [J].
Annerstedt, Matilda ;
Wahrborg, Peter .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 39 (04) :371-388
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, HEALTH QUAL LIFE OUT, DOI DOI 10.1186/s12955-017-0649-1
[4]  
Barton J, 2016, GREEN EXERCISE: LINKING NATURE, HEALTH AND WELL-BEING, P1
[5]  
Bragg R., 2017, NATURAL ENGLAND COMM, V228
[6]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2019, PHYS ACT FACTS
[7]   Assessment of Screen Exposure in Young Children, 1997 to 2014 [J].
Chen, Weiwei ;
Adler, Jessica L. .
JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2019, 173 (04) :391-393
[8]  
Christiana R.W., 2017, GLOB PEDIAT HLTH, P4, DOI [10.1177/2333794X1773919329152542, DOI 10.1177/2333794X1773919329152542]
[9]  
Christiana Richard W, 2017, Prev Med Rep, V5, P100
[10]   An environmental intervention to restore attention in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer [J].
Cimprich, B ;
Ronis, DL .
CANCER NURSING, 2003, 26 (04) :284-292