Estimates of Pain Prevalence and Severity in Adults: United States, 2012

被引:680
作者
Nahin, Richard L. [1 ]
机构
[1] NIH, Natl Ctr Complementary & Integrat Hlth, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
Cross-sectional study; pain frequency; pain severity; language preference; minority groups; NATIONAL-HEALTH; GENERAL-POPULATION; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; FOLLOW-UP; LOW-BACK; HISPANICS; COMMUNITY; LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpain.2015.05.002
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Using a simple approach for coding pain severity, the present study describes self-reported pain in U.S. adults. Data are included for 8,781 adults who completed the Functioning and Disability Supplement of the 2012 National Health Interview Survey. An internationally piloted pain severity coding system was used to group participants into 5 discrete ordered pain categories based on their pain persistence (days with pain in the last 3 months) and bothersomeness (little, a lot, somewhere in between): pain free and categories 1 (low) to 4 (high). It is estimated that 126.1 million adults reported some pain in the previous 3 months, with 25.3 million adults (11.2%) suffering from daily (chronic) pain and 23.4 million (10.3%) reporting a lot of pain. Based on the persistence and bothersomeness of their pain, 14.4 million adults (6.4%) were classified as having the highest level of pain, category 4, with an additional 25.4 million adults (11.3%) experiencing category 3 pain. Individuals with category 3 or 4 pain were likely to have worse health status, to use more health care, and to suffer from more disability than those with less severe pain. Associations were seen between pain severity and selected demographic variables including race, ethnicity, preferred language, sex, and age. Perspective: U.S. estimates of pain prevalence are presented using a simple approach for assigning pain severity developed by the Washington Group on Disability Statistics. Concurrent validity is assessed. Although this approach is promising, additional work is required to determine the usefulness of the Washington Group pain categories for pain research or clinical practice. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Pain Society
引用
收藏
页码:769 / 780
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2013, DAT FIL DOC NAT HLTH
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, HLTH US 2006 CHARTB
  • [3] [Anonymous], [No title captured]
  • [4] [Anonymous], ADV DATA VITAL HLTH
  • [5] Bolen J, 2010, PREV CHRONIC DIS, V7
  • [6] Pharmacist-led management of chronic pain in primary care: results from a randomised controlled exploratory trial
    Bruhn, Hanne
    Bond, Christine M.
    Elliott, Alison M.
    Hannaford, Philip C.
    Lee, Amanda J.
    McNamee, Paul
    Smith, Blair H.
    Watson, Margaret C.
    Holland, Richard
    Wright, David
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (04):
  • [7] Chowdhury PR, 2008, ETHNIC DIS, V18, P483
  • [8] Association of Chronic Widespread Pain With Objectively Measured Physical Activity in Adults: Findings From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
    Dansie, Elizabeth J.
    Turk, Dennis C.
    Martin, Kathryn R.
    Van Domelen, Dane R.
    Patel, Kushang V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2014, 15 (05) : 507 - 515
  • [9] Back pain prevalence and visit rates - Estimates from US national surveys, 2002
    Deyo, Richard A.
    Mirza, Sohail K.
    Martin, Brook I.
    [J]. SPINE, 2006, 31 (23) : 2724 - 2727
  • [10] Report of the NIH Task Force on Research Standards for Chronic Low Back Pain
    Deyo, Richard A.
    Dworkin, Samuel F.
    Amtmann, Dagmar
    Andersson, Gunnar
    Borenstein, David
    Carragee, Eugene
    Carrino, John
    Chou, Roger
    Cook, Karon
    DeLitto, Anthony
    Goertz, Christine
    Khalsa, Partap
    Loeser, John
    Mackey, Sean
    Panagis, James
    Rainville, James
    Tosteson, Tor
    Turk, Dennis
    Von Korff, Michael
    Weinertt, Debra K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2014, 15 (06) : 569 - 585