Assessment of Daily Needle Applicator Displacement during High-Dose-Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer using Daily CT Examinations

被引:8
作者
Takenaka, Tadashi [2 ]
Yoshida, Ken [1 ,3 ]
Ueda, Mari [2 ]
Yamazaki, Hideya [4 ]
Miyake, Shunsuke [2 ]
Tanaka, Eiichi [1 ]
Yoshida, Mineo [1 ]
Yoshimura, Yasushi [2 ]
Oka, Toshitsugu [5 ]
Honda, Kazuya [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Hosp Org Osaka Natl Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Osaka, Japan
[2] Natl Hosp Org Osaka Natl Hosp, Dept Radiol, Chuo Ku, Osaka 5400006, Japan
[3] Natl Hosp Org Osaka Natl Hosp, Inst Clin Res, Osaka, Japan
[4] Kyoto Prefectural Univ Med, Dept Radiol, Kyoto 602, Japan
[5] Natl Hosp Org Osaka Natl Hosp, Dept Urol, Osaka, Japan
关键词
Applicator displacement; High-dose-rate; Interstitial brachytherapy; Prostate cancer; HDR BRACHYTHERAPY; CATHETER MOVEMENT; EXTERNAL-BEAM; MONOTHERAPY; FRACTIONS;
D O I
10.1269/jrr.11168
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
To improve treatment conformity for prostate cancer, we investigated daily applicator displacement during high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT). Thirty patients treated with HDR-ISBT as monotherapy were examined. All patients received a treatment dosage of 49 Gy per 7 fractions over 4 days. For dose administration, we examined 376 flexible applicators (1128 points) using our unique ambulatory implant technique. Using CT images with a 3-mm slice thickness, we calculated the relative coordinates of the titanium markers and the tips of the applicators. We calculated the distance between the center of gravity of the markers and the tips of the catheters, and compared the distances measured on the day of implantation and the second, third, and fourth treatment days. The mean displacement distance for all applicators was 4.3 +/- 3.4 mm, 4.6 +/- 4.1 mm, and 5.8 +/- 4.5 mm at 21, 45, and 69 hours after initial planning CT. We used a 15-mm margin for needle displacement and only 2 points of 2 patients (16 mm and 18 mm at 69 hours, 2/1128 = 0.2%) exceeded this range. Almost patients (87%) showed the largest displacement within the first 21 hours. The relative doses that covered 100% of CTV (D100(CTV)) values compared with the initial treatment plan were reduced to 0.96 +/- 0.08, 0.96 +/- 0.08 and 0.94 +/- 0.1 at 21, 45 and 69 hours. However, the relative D90(CTV) values kept acceptable levels (1.01 +/- 0.02, 1.01 +/- 0.03 and 1.01 +/- 0.03). Cranial margin of 15 mm seems to be effective to keep D90(CTV) level if we do not do corrective action.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 474
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Needle displacement during HDR brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer [J].
Damore, SJ ;
Syed, AMN ;
Puthawala, AA ;
Sharma, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (05) :1205-1211
[2]   DOSIMETRIC IMPACT OF INTERFRACTION CATHETER MOVEMENT IN HIGH-DOSE RATE PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY [J].
Foster, William ;
Cunha, J. Adam M. ;
Hsu, I-Chow ;
Weinberg, Vivan ;
Krishnamurthy, Devan ;
Pouliot, Jean .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 80 (01) :85-90
[3]   High dose rate afterloading brachytherapy for prostate cancer: catheter and gland movement between fractions [J].
Hoskin, PJ ;
Bownes, PJ ;
Ostler, P ;
Walker, K ;
Bryant, L .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 68 (03) :285-288
[4]  
Kim Y, 2004, MED PHYS, V31, P2543, DOI 10.1118/1.1796111
[5]  
Kim Y, 2007, J APPL CLIN MED PHYS, V8, P1, DOI 10.1120/jacmp.v8i4.2415
[6]   HDR monotherapy for prostate cancer: A simulation study to determine the effect of catheter displacement on target coverage and normal tissue irradiation [J].
Kolkman-Deurloo, Inger-Karine K. ;
Roos, Martin A. ;
Aluwini, Shafak .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 98 (02) :192-197
[7]   Prostate preservation by combined external beam and HDR brachytherapy in nodal negative prostate cancer [J].
Kovács, G ;
Galalae, R ;
Loch, T ;
Bertermann, H ;
Kohr, P ;
Schneider, R ;
Kimming, B .
STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 1999, 175 (Suppl 2) :87-88
[8]   GEC/ESTRO-EAU recommendations on temporary brachytherapy using stepping sources for localised prostate cancer [J].
Kovács, G ;
Pötter, R ;
Loch, T ;
Hammer, J ;
Kolkman-Deurloo, IK ;
de la Rosette, JJMCH ;
Bertermann, H .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 74 (02) :137-148
[9]  
Kovalchuk N, 2011, BRACHYTHERA IN PRESS
[10]  
Martin T, 2004, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V180, P225, DOI 10.1007/s00066-004-1215-4