Do SEII Electrons Really Degrade SEM Image Quality?

被引:8
作者
Bernstein, Gary H. [1 ]
Carter, Andrew D. [2 ]
Joy, David C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Elect Engn, Ctr Nano Sci & Technol, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
scanning electron microscopy; backscattered electrons; secondary electrons; electron beam lithography; Monte Carlo simulations; MICROSCOPY;
D O I
10.1002/sca.21027
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
Generally, in scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging, it is desirable that a high-resolution image be composed mainly of those secondary electrons (SEs) generated by the primary electron beam, denoted SEI. However, in conventional SEM imaging, other, often unwanted, signal components consisting of backscattered electrons (BSEs), and their associated SEs, denoted SEII, are present; these signal components contribute a random background signal that degrades contrast, and therefore signal-to-noise ratio and resolution. Ideally, the highest resolution SEM image would consist only of the SEI component. In SEMs that use conventional pinhole lenses and their associated EverhartThornley detectors, the image is composed of several components, including SEI, SEII, and some BSE, depending on the geometry of the detector. Modern snorkel lens systems eliminate the BSEs, but not the SEIIs. We present a microfabricated diaphragm for minimizing the unwanted SEII signal components. We present evidence of improved imaging using a microlithographically generated pattern of Au, about 500 nm thick, that blocks most of the undesired signal components, leaving an image composed mostly of SEIs. We refer to this structure as a spatial backscatter diaphragm. SCANNING 35:1-6, 2013. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] NEW HIGH-CONTRAST DEVELOPERS FOR POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE) RESIST
    BERNSTEIN, GH
    HILL, DA
    LIU, WP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1992, 71 (08) : 4066 - 4075
  • [2] DRESCHER H, 1970, Z ANGEW PHYSIK, V29, P331
  • [3] WIDE-BAND DETECTOR FOR MICRO-MICROAMPERE LOW-ENERGY ELECTRON CURRENTS
    EVERHART, TE
    THORNLEY, RFM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1960, 37 (07): : 246 - 248
  • [4] A Comparison of Conventional Everhart-Thornley Style and In-Lens Secondary Electron Detectors-A Further Variable in Scanning Electron Microscopy
    Griffin, Brendan J.
    [J]. SCANNING, 2011, 33 (03) : 162 - 173
  • [5] Hovington P, 1987, SCANNING, V19, P1
  • [6] Atomic imaging using secondary electrons in a scanning transmission electron microscope: Experimental observations and possible mechanisms
    Inada, H.
    Su, D.
    Egerton, R. F.
    Konno, M.
    Wu, L.
    Ciston, J.
    Wall, J.
    Zhu, Y.
    [J]. ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 2011, 111 (07) : 865 - 876
  • [7] PENETRATION AND ENERGY-LOSS THEORY OF ELECTRONS IN SOLID TARGETS
    KANAYA, K
    OKAYAMA, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 1972, 5 (01) : 43 - &
  • [8] Peters K.-R., 1984, Electron Beam Interactions with Solids for Microscopy, Microanalysis and Microlithography. Proceedings of the 1st Pfefferkorn Conference, P363
  • [9] PETERS KR, 1985, SCANNING ELECTRON MI, V4, P1519
  • [10] Scott J. H. J., 2018, SCANNING ELECT MICRO