Environmental and cost efficiency of pesticide use in transgenic and conventional cotton production

被引:47
作者
Wossink, Ada
Denaux, Zulal S.
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Valdosta State Univ, Harley Langdale Jr Coll Business, Dept Marketing & Econ, Valdosta, GA 31698 USA
关键词
cotton; biotechnology; data envelopment analysis; pesticide leaching potential; environmental efficiency; tobit analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2006.01.004
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
This study focuses on the quantification of pesticide use efficiency for producers of transgenic cotton versus conventional cotton in order to test for the improvement promised by the genetically engineered crop. The environmental and cost efficiency of pesticide use is assessed by means of data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the external effects of pesticide are quantified by means of the pesticide leaching potential. To account for the fact that conditions other than the 'treatment" (seed type) are not equal in farm surveys the study employs a second step Tobit regression. The data are from a survey of cotton growers in North Carolina, USA. Differences in environmental efficiency are found to be significant between herbicide tolerant and stacked gene (herbicide tolerant and insect resistant) cotton and between stacked gene and conventional cotton. In contrast, no statistically significant differences are found for efficiency of pest control cost. In the follow-up Tobit regression, differences in production environment and in farm, farmer and field characteristics are accounted for so that the contribution of seed type to efficiency can be observed. The regression results confirm the importance of stacked gene cotton for improving the environmental efficiency of pesticide use in cotton. In contrast, seed type was not significant in explaining differences in cost efficiency among North Carolina cotton growers. The new technology reduces pesticide application but these benefits are curbed by the high price of cotton seed (technology fee). (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 328
页数:17
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[2]  
Coelli T.J., 2005, INTRO EFFICIENCY PRO, DOI 10.1007/b136381
[3]   Measuring agricultural sustainability in terms of efficiency: the case of Dutch sugar beet growers [J].
De Koeijer, TJ ;
Wossink, GAA ;
Struik, PC ;
Renkema, JA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2002, 66 (01) :9-17
[4]   Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA) [J].
Dyckhoff, H ;
Allen, K .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 132 (02) :312-325
[5]  
Edge J. M., 2001, Journal of Cotton Science, V5, P121
[6]  
Faircloth JC, 2004, CROP SCI, V44, P165, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2004.0165
[7]  
FARE R., 1994, Production Frontiers
[8]   THE MEASUREMENT OF PRODUCTIVE EFFICIENCY [J].
FARRELL, MJ .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-GENERAL, 1957, 120 (03) :253-290
[9]  
Fernandez-Cornejo Jorge., 2002, J AGRIC APPL ECON, V34, P149, DOI DOI 10.1017/S1074070800002200.
[10]  
FERNANDEZCORNEJ.J, 2002, AER810 USDAERS AGR E