A New Approach to the Group Ranking Problem: Finding Consensus Ordered Segments from Users' Preference Data

被引:9
作者
Chen, Yen-Liang [1 ]
Cheng, Li-Chen [2 ]
Hsu, Weu-Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cent Univ, Dept Informat Management, Chungli 320, Taiwan
[2] Soochow Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Informat Management, Taipei 100, Taiwan
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; Cluster Analysis; Collaborative Decision Models; Group; Team Decision Making; Group Decision Support; AGGREGATION; PROPOSALS; DISTANCES; REVIEWERS;
D O I
10.1111/deci.12048
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The group ranking problem involves constructing coherent aggregated results from users' preference data. The goal of most group ranking problems is to generate an ordered list of all items that represents the user consensus. There are, however, two weaknesses to this approach. First, a complete list of ranked items is always output even when there is no consensus or only a slight consensus. Second, due to similarity of performance, in many practical situations, it is very difficult to differentiate whether one item is really better than another within a set. These weaknesses have motivated us to apply the clustering concept to the group ranking problem, to output an ordered list of segments containing a set of similarly preferred items, called consensus ordered segments. The advantages of our approach are that (i) the list of segments is based on the users' consensuses, (ii) the items with similar preferences are grouped together in the same segment, and (iii) the relationships between items can be easily seen. An algorithm is developed to construct the consensus of the ordered segments from the users' total ranking data. Finally, the experimental results indicate that the proposed method is computationally efficient, and can effectively identify consensus ordered segments.
引用
收藏
页码:1091 / 1119
页数:29
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1962, Mathematical models in the social sciences
[2]   VOTING SCHEMES FOR WHICH IT CAN BE DIFFICULT TO TELL WHO WON THE ELECTION [J].
BARTHOLDI, J ;
TOVEY, CA ;
TRICK, MA .
SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 1989, 6 (02) :157-165
[3]   Soft computing techniques for rank aggregation on the World Wide Web [J].
Beg, MMS ;
Ahmad, N .
WORLD WIDE WEB-INTERNET AND WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2003, 6 (01) :5-22
[4]   PREFERENCE STRUCTURES .1. DISTANCES BETWEEN TRANSITIVE PREFERENCE RELATIONS [J].
BOGART, KP .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL SOCIOLOGY, 1973, 3 (01) :49-67
[5]   PREFERENCE STRUCTURES .2. DISTANCES BETWEEN ASYMMETRIC RELATIONS [J].
BOGART, KP .
SIAM JOURNAL ON APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 1975, 29 (02) :254-262
[6]  
Borda J. C., 1781, Memoire sur les elections au scrutin
[7]   An Alternative FMEA Method for Simple and Accurate Ranking of Failure Modes [J].
Bradley, James R. ;
Guerrero, Hector H. .
DECISION SCIENCES, 2011, 42 (03) :743-771
[8]   A novel collaborative filtering approach for recommending ranked items [J].
Chen, Yen-Liang ;
Cheng, Li-Chen .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2008, 34 (04) :2396-2405
[9]   An approach to group ranking decisions in a dynamic environment [J].
Chen, Yen-Liang ;
Cheng, Li-Chen .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2010, 48 (04) :622-634
[10]   Mining maximum consensus sequences from group ranking data [J].
Chen, Yen-Liang ;
Cheng, Li-Chen .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 198 (01) :241-251