Top-down influences mediate hand bias in spatial attention

被引:20
作者
Garza, John P. [2 ]
Strom, Michael J. [1 ]
Wright, Charles E. [3 ]
Roberts, Ralph J., Jr. [2 ]
Reed, Catherine L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Claremont Mckenna Coll, Dept Psychol, Claremont, CA 91711 USA
[2] Univ Denver, Dept Psychol, Denver, CO 80208 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Cognit Sci, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
关键词
Spatial attention; Cue predictability; Embodiment; Top-down; Task relevance; Multisensory integration; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-013-0480-7
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Spatial attention can be biased to locations near the hand. Some studies have found facilitated processing of targets appearing within hand-grasping space. In this study, we investigated how changing top-down task priorities alters hand bias during visual processing. In Experiment 1, we used a covert orienting paradigm with nonpredictive cues and emphasized the location of the hand relative to the target. Hands or visual anchors (boards) were placed next to potential target locations, and responses were made with the contralateral hand. Results indicated a hand-specific processing bias: Hand location, but not board location, speeded responses to targets near the hand. This pattern of results replicated previous studies using covert orienting paradigms with highly predictive cues. In Experiment 2, we used the same basic paradigm but emphasized the location of the response hand. Results now showed speeded responses to targets near response locations. Together these experiments demonstrated that top-down instructional sets (i.e., what is considered to be most relevant to task performance) can change the processing priority of hand location by influencing the strength of top-down, as compared with bottom-up, inputs competing for attention resources.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 823
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Hemispheric lateralization in top-down attention during spatial relation processing: a Granger causal model approach [J].
Falasca, N. W. ;
D'Ascenzo, S. ;
Di Domenico, A. ;
Onofrj, M. ;
Tommasi, L. ;
Laeng, B. ;
Franciotti, R. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 41 (07) :912-922
[42]   Top-down influences on bi-stable perceptions revealed by ERPs [J].
Pitts, Michael A. ;
Gavin, William J. ;
Davalos, Deana B. ;
Nerger, Janice L. .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 43 :S78-S78
[43]   Top-Down Control in Contour Grouping [J].
Volberg, Gregor ;
Wutz, Andreas ;
Greenlee, Mark W. .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (01)
[44]   Top-Down Influences of Written Text on Perceived Clarity of Degraded Speech [J].
Sohoglu, Ediz ;
Peelle, Jonathan E. ;
Carlyon, Robert P. ;
Davis, Matthew H. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2014, 40 (01) :186-199
[45]   A Study of Top-Down Visual Attention Model Based on Similarity Distance [J].
Zhang Jing ;
Zhuo Li ;
Gao Jingjing ;
Liu Zhixing .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOLS 1-9, 2009, :946-950
[46]   Neural entrainment and network resonance in support of top-down guided attention [J].
Helfrich, Randolph F. ;
Breska, Assaf ;
Knight, Robert T. .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 29 :82-89
[47]   Working Memory Encoding Delays Top-Down Attention to Visual Cortex [J].
Scalf, Paige E. ;
Dux, Paul E. ;
Marois, Rene .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 23 (09) :2593-2604
[48]   Editorial: A Matter of Bottom-Up or Top-Down Processes: The Role of Attention in Multisensory Integration [J].
Hartcher-O'Brien, Jess ;
Soto-Faraco, Salvador ;
Adam, Ruth .
FRONTIERS IN INTEGRATIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 11
[49]   The modulation of reward priority by top-down knowledge [J].
Stankevich, Beth A. ;
Geng, Joy J. .
VISUAL COGNITION, 2015, 23 (1-2) :206-228
[50]   What is top-down about seeing enemies? Social anxiety and attention to threat [J].
Hannah L. Delchau ;
Bruce K. Christensen ;
Richard O’Kearney ;
Stephanie C. Goodhew .
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2020, 82 :1779-1792