Top-down influences mediate hand bias in spatial attention

被引:20
作者
Garza, John P. [2 ]
Strom, Michael J. [1 ]
Wright, Charles E. [3 ]
Roberts, Ralph J., Jr. [2 ]
Reed, Catherine L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Claremont Mckenna Coll, Dept Psychol, Claremont, CA 91711 USA
[2] Univ Denver, Dept Psychol, Denver, CO 80208 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Cognit Sci, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
关键词
Spatial attention; Cue predictability; Embodiment; Top-down; Task relevance; Multisensory integration; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-013-0480-7
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Spatial attention can be biased to locations near the hand. Some studies have found facilitated processing of targets appearing within hand-grasping space. In this study, we investigated how changing top-down task priorities alters hand bias during visual processing. In Experiment 1, we used a covert orienting paradigm with nonpredictive cues and emphasized the location of the hand relative to the target. Hands or visual anchors (boards) were placed next to potential target locations, and responses were made with the contralateral hand. Results indicated a hand-specific processing bias: Hand location, but not board location, speeded responses to targets near the hand. This pattern of results replicated previous studies using covert orienting paradigms with highly predictive cues. In Experiment 2, we used the same basic paradigm but emphasized the location of the response hand. Results now showed speeded responses to targets near response locations. Together these experiments demonstrated that top-down instructional sets (i.e., what is considered to be most relevant to task performance) can change the processing priority of hand location by influencing the strength of top-down, as compared with bottom-up, inputs competing for attention resources.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 823
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Bottom-up and top-down attention are independent [J].
Pinto, Yair ;
van der Leij, Andries R. ;
Sligte, Ilja G. ;
Lamme, Victor A. F. ;
Scholte, H. Steven .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2013, 13 (03) :16
[12]   Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention [J].
Gao, Ya ;
Theeuwes, Jan .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2020, 82 (08) :3895-3906
[13]   The amygdala, top-down effects, and selective attention to features [J].
Jacobs, Richard H. A. H. ;
Renken, Remco ;
Aleman, Andre ;
Cornelissen, Frans W. .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2012, 36 (09) :2069-2084
[14]   Top-down influences on the perception of emotional stimuli [J].
Mohanty, Aprajita ;
Freeman, Jonathan ;
Jin, Jingwen .
NATURE REVIEWS PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, 4 (06) :388-403
[15]   Top-Down Contributions to Attention Shifting and Disengagement: A Template Model of Visual Attention [J].
Yamaguchi, Motonori ;
Valji, Ashvanti ;
Wolohan, Felicity D. A. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2018, 147 (06) :859-887
[16]   Top-Down Neural Attention by Excitation Backprop [J].
Zhang, Jianming ;
Lin, Zhe ;
Brandt, Jonathan ;
Shen, Xiaohui ;
Sclaroff, Stan .
COMPUTER VISION - ECCV 2016, PT IV, 2016, 9908 :543-559
[17]   Top-down attention selection is fine grained [J].
Navalpakkam, Vidhya ;
Itti, Laurent .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2006, 6 (11) :1180-1193
[18]   Top-down cortical interactions in visuospatial attention [J].
Meehan, Timothy P. ;
Bressler, Steven L. ;
Tang, Wei ;
Astafiev, Serguei V. ;
Sylvester, Chad M. ;
Shulman, Gordon L. ;
Corbetta, Maurizio .
BRAIN STRUCTURE & FUNCTION, 2017, 222 (07) :3127-3145
[19]   The limits of top-down control of visual attention [J].
Van der Stigchel, Stefan ;
Belopolsky, Artem V. ;
Peters, Judith C. ;
Wijnen, Jasper G. ;
Meeter, Martijn ;
Theeuwes, Jan .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2009, 132 (03) :201-212
[20]   Top-Down Neural Attention by Excitation Backprop [J].
Zhang, Jianming ;
Bargal, Sarah Adel ;
Lin, Zhe ;
Brandt, Jonathan ;
Shen, Xiaohui ;
Sclaroff, Stan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION, 2018, 126 (10) :1084-1102