Top-down influences mediate hand bias in spatial attention

被引:20
|
作者
Garza, John P. [2 ]
Strom, Michael J. [1 ]
Wright, Charles E. [3 ]
Roberts, Ralph J., Jr. [2 ]
Reed, Catherine L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Claremont Mckenna Coll, Dept Psychol, Claremont, CA 91711 USA
[2] Univ Denver, Dept Psychol, Denver, CO 80208 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Cognit Sci, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
关键词
Spatial attention; Cue predictability; Embodiment; Top-down; Task relevance; Multisensory integration; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-013-0480-7
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Spatial attention can be biased to locations near the hand. Some studies have found facilitated processing of targets appearing within hand-grasping space. In this study, we investigated how changing top-down task priorities alters hand bias during visual processing. In Experiment 1, we used a covert orienting paradigm with nonpredictive cues and emphasized the location of the hand relative to the target. Hands or visual anchors (boards) were placed next to potential target locations, and responses were made with the contralateral hand. Results indicated a hand-specific processing bias: Hand location, but not board location, speeded responses to targets near the hand. This pattern of results replicated previous studies using covert orienting paradigms with highly predictive cues. In Experiment 2, we used the same basic paradigm but emphasized the location of the response hand. Results now showed speeded responses to targets near response locations. Together these experiments demonstrated that top-down instructional sets (i.e., what is considered to be most relevant to task performance) can change the processing priority of hand location by influencing the strength of top-down, as compared with bottom-up, inputs competing for attention resources.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 823
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Top-down influences mediate hand bias in spatial attention
    John P. Garza
    Michael J. Strom
    Charles E. Wright
    Ralph J. Roberts
    Catherine L. Reed
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2013, 75 : 819 - 823
  • [2] Top-Down Influences of Spatial Attention in Visual Cortex
    Bouvier, Seth E.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 29 (06): : 1597 - 1598
  • [3] Top-down control of the left visual field bias in cued visual spatial attention
    Meyyappan, Sreenivasan
    Rajan, Abhijit
    Mangun, George R.
    Ding, Mingzhou
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2023, 33 (09) : 5097 - 5107
  • [4] The Rubber Hand Illusion: Top-down attention modulates embodiment
    Theriault, Remi
    Landry, Mathieu
    Raz, Amir
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 75 (11): : 2129 - 2148
  • [5] TOP-DOWN SPATIAL ATTENTION IS IMPORTANT BUT NOT NECESSARY FOR CONTINGENT ATTENTION CAPTURE
    Su, Yuling
    Qu, Zhe
    Ding, Yulong
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 50 : S110 - S110
  • [6] Attention shifts in the spatial cueing paradigm reflect direct influences of experience and not top-down goals
    Trost, Jamie M.
    Gibson, Bradley S.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2024, 31 (04) : 1536 - 1547
  • [7] Bottom-up and top-down influences on spatial unmasking
    Shinn-Cunningham, BG
    Ihlefeld, A
    Satyavarta
    Larson, E
    ACTA ACUSTICA UNITED WITH ACUSTICA, 2005, 91 (06) : 967 - 979
  • [8] Top-Down Influences in the Detection of Spatial Displacement in a Musical Scene
    Marentakis, Georgios
    Griffiths, Cathryn
    McAdams, Stephen
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED PERCEPTION, 2016, 14 (01)
  • [9] The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture
    Huang, Wanyi
    Su, Yuling
    Zhen, Yanfen
    Qu, Zhe
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 53 (05) : 650 - 662
  • [10] Top-down control in visual spatial attention: ERP correlates
    Kehrer, S.
    Kraft, A.
    Irlbacher, K.
    Koch, S. P.
    Hagendorf, H.
    Kathmann, N.
    Brandt, S. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 69 (03) : 215 - 215