Randomized trial of concurrent oxytocin with a sustained-release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction at term

被引:22
作者
Christensen, FC
Tehranifar, M
Gonzalez, JL
Qualls, CR
Rappaport, VJ
Rayburn, WF
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[2] Univ New Mexico, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Math & Biostat, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
cervical ripening; labor induction; dinoprostone; oxytocin; hyperstimulation;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2002.118309
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the concurrent administration of oxytocin with sustained-release dinoprostone results in shorter induction times when compared with oxytocin after the removal of the dinoprostone insert. STUDY DESIGN: Women with singleton pregnancies at greater than or equal to36 weeks, vertex presentations, reactive nonstress tests, no prior uterine scar, intact membranes, and Bishop scores of less than or equal to6 were randomly assigned to receive oxytocin either immediately after placement of a sustained-release dinoprostone insert (immediate) or 30 minutes after its removal (delayed). The primary outcome was the time interval from induction to delivery. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were enrolled (immediate, 34 patients; delayed, 37 patients). There were no differences between treatment groups in nonreassuring fetal heart tracings, excess uterine activity, and epidural use. The mean time from dinoprostone placement until delivery was 544 minutes, shorter in the immediate group (972 vs 1516 minutes; P = .001). The proportion of deliveries within 24 hours was higher (90% vs 53%; P = .002) in the immediate group. Cesarean delivery rates were similar between the immediate and delayed groups (16% vs 13%; P = .73). No adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes were observed with concurrent therapy. CONCLUSION: Oxytocin that is administered concurrently with sustained-release dinoprostone significantly shortens induction-to-delivery times and results in a higher proportion of vaginal deliveries of less than or equal to24 hours with no apparent adverse effects.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 65
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   A randomized comparison of oral misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor at term [J].
Abramovici, D ;
Goldwasser, S ;
Mabie, BC ;
Mercer, BM ;
Goldwasser, R ;
Sibai, BM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (05) :1108-1112
[2]  
ACOG, 1999, ACOG PRACT B
[3]  
*ACOG, 1993, ACOG TECHN B, V218
[4]  
Beebe LA, 2000, J REPROD MED, V45, P469
[5]  
BISHOP EH, 1964, OBSTET GYNECOL, V24, P266
[6]  
Coleman FH, 1997, J REPROD MED, V42, P44
[7]   The epidemiology of labor induction: Arizona, 1997 [J].
Coonrod, DV ;
Bay, RC ;
Kishi, GY .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (06) :1355-1360
[8]   Extra-amniotic saline, laminaria, or prostaglandin E2 gel for labor induction with unfavorable cervix:: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Guinn, DA ;
Goepfert, AR ;
Christine, M ;
Owen, J ;
Hauth, JC .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 96 (01) :106-112
[9]  
JACKSON GM, 1994, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V79, P374
[10]  
*MED EC, 1998, PHYS DESK REF, P946