A methodology to incorporate risk and uncertainty in electricity power planning

被引:41
作者
Santos, Maria Joao [1 ]
Ferreira, Paula [1 ]
Araujo, Madalena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minho, Sch Engn, ALGORITMI Res Ctr, Guimaraes, Portugal
关键词
Uncertainty; Electricity planning; Optimization model; Monte Carlo simulation; Renewable energy sources; ENERGY; OPTIMIZATION; DEMAND; TECHNOLOGIES; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGIES; MODEL; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.080
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Deterministic models based on most likely forecasts can bring simplicity to the electricity power planning but do not explicitly consider uncertainties and risks which are always present on the electricity systems. Stochastic models can account for uncertain parameters that are critical to obtain a robust solution, requiring however higher modelling and computational effort. The aim of this work was to propose a methodology to identify major uncertainties presented in the electricity system and demonstrate their impact in the long-term electricity production mix, through scenario analysis. The case of an electricity system with high renewable contribution was used to demonstrate how renewables uncertainty can be included in long term planning, combining Monte Carlo Simulation with a deterministic optimization model. This case showed that the problem, of including risk in electricity planning could be explored in short running time even for large real systems. The results indicate that high growth demand rate combined with climate uncertainty represent major sources of risk for the definition of robust optimal technology mixes for the future. This is particularly important for the case of electricity systems with high share of renewables as climate change can have a major role on the expected power output. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1400 / 1411
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   A multi-actor multi-criteria scenario analysis of regional sustainable resource policy [J].
Akgun, Aliye Ahu ;
van Leeuwen, Eveline ;
Nijkamp, Peter .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 78 :19-28
[2]   A review of scenario planning [J].
Amer, Muhammad ;
Daim, Tugrul U. ;
Jetter, Antonie .
FUTURES, 2013, 46 :23-40
[3]  
Bankes S., 1992, Exploratory Modeling and the Use of Simulation for Policy Analysis
[4]   Identification of optimal strategies for energy management systems planning under multiple uncertainties [J].
Cai, Y. P. ;
Huang, G. H. ;
Yang, Z. F. ;
Tan, Q. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2009, 86 (04) :480-495
[5]   Social acceptance of on-shore wind energy in Apulia Region (Southern Italy) [J].
Caporale, Diana ;
De Lucia, Caterina .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 52 :1378-1390
[6]   Hydrological Uncertainty and Hydropower: New Methods to Optimize the Performance of the Plant [J].
Casadei, S. ;
Liucci, L. ;
Valigi, D. .
EUROPEAN GEOSCIENCES UNION GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2014, EGU DIVISION ENERGY, RESOURCES & THE ENVIRONMENT (ERE), 2014, 59 :263-269
[7]   Performance comparison of Transmission Network Expansion Planning under deterministic and uncertain conditions [J].
Cedeno, Enrique B. ;
Arora, Sant .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2011, 33 (07) :1288-1295
[8]  
DGEG REN, 2013, REL MON SEG AB SIST
[9]  
EDP Distribuicao, 2014, PALN DES INV RED DIS
[10]  
EVALUE, 2011, EST PROJ AMB EC SA C