N-nitrosamine rejection by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: The importance of membrane characteristics

被引:62
作者
Fujioka, Takahiro [1 ]
Khan, Stuart J. [2 ]
McDonald, James A. [2 ]
Roux, Annalie [3 ]
Poussade, Yvan [4 ]
Drewes, Joerg E. [2 ,5 ]
Nghiem, Long D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Sch Civil Min & Environm Engn, Strateg Water Infrastruct Lab, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, UNSW Water Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[3] Seqwater, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[4] Veolia Water Australia, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[5] Colorado Sch Mines, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Adv Water Technol Ctr AQWATEC, Golden, CO 80401 USA
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Water recycling; N-nitrosamines; NDMA; Reverse osmosis; Nanofiltration; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; TRANSPORT; PRECURSORS; RETENTION; REMOVAL; REUSE; FATE; SIZE; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.desal.2013.01.028
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The influence of membrane characteristics on the rejection of eight N-nitrosamines was investigated using one nanofiltration (NF), one seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) and six low pressure reverse osmosis (LPRO) membranes. The rejection of the two lowest molecular weight N-nitrosamines, namely N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) and N-nitrosomethylethylamine (NMEA), varied in the range from 8-82% to 23-94%, respectively. In general, the rejection of NDMA and NMEA increased with decreasing membrane permeability. The impact of membrane characteristics became less important for higher molecular weight N-nitrosamines. Among the four LPRO membranes (i.e. ESPA2, LFC3, TFC-HR and 70LW) that are commonly used for water reclamation applications, similar rejections were obtained for NDMA (37-52%) and NMEA (69-82%). In addition, rejection values of NDMA and NMEA among two LPRO membranes (i.e. ESPA2 and 70LW) were almost identical when compared under variable permeate flux and feed temperature conditions. However, it is noteworthy that the ESPAB membrane could achieve very high rejection of NDMA (as high as 71%) despite having a similar permeability to the LPRO membranes. Results reported here suggest that membrane characteristics associated with permeability such as the pore size and thickness of the active skin layer can be a key factor determining N-nitrosamine rejection. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 75
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Retention of a wide variety of organic pollutants by different nanofiltration/reverse osmosis membranes: controlling parameters of process [J].
Agenson, KO ;
Oh, JI ;
Urase, T .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2003, 225 (1-2) :91-103
[2]   Chemical cleaning of RO membranes fouled by wastewater effluent: Achieving higher efficiency with dual-step cleaning [J].
Ang, Wui Seng ;
Yip, Ngai Yin ;
Tiraferri, Alberto ;
Elimelech, Menachem .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2011, 382 (1-2) :100-106
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, NDMA and Other Nitrosamines - Drinking Water Issues
[4]  
Bellona C, 2008, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V100, P102
[5]   Viability of a low-pressure nanofilter in treating recycled water for water reuse applications: A pilot-scale study [J].
Bellona, Christopher ;
Drewes, Joerg E. .
WATER RESEARCH, 2007, 41 (17) :3948-3958
[6]   The pros and cons of using nanofiltration in lieu of reverse osmosis for indirect potable reuse applications [J].
Bellona, Christopher ;
Heil, Dean ;
Yu, Christopher ;
Fu, Paul ;
Drewes, Joerg E. .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 85 :69-76
[7]  
Drewes J., 2011, WATER QUALITY TREATM
[8]   Fate and transport of N-nitrosamines under conditions simulating full-scale groundwater recharge operations [J].
Drewes, Joerg E. ;
Hoppe, Christiane ;
Jennings, Terry .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2006, 78 (13) :2466-2473
[9]  
EPHC/NHMRC/NRMMC, 2008, AUSTR GUID WAT REC A
[10]   Occurrence of N-nitrosodimethylamine precursors in wastewater treatment plant effluent and their fate during ultrafiltration-reverse osmosis membrane treatment [J].
Farre, M. J. ;
Keller, J. ;
Holling, N. ;
Poussade, Y. ;
Gernjak, W. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 63 (04) :605-612