Promoting effective use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: themes from a "Methods Tool kit'' paper series

被引:16
作者
Brundage, Michael D. [1 ]
Wu, Albert W. [2 ,3 ]
Rivera, Yonaira M. [2 ]
Snyder, Claire [4 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Kingston Hlth Sci Ctr, Queens Canc Res Inst, Canc Ctr Southeastern Ontario,Canc Care & Epidemi, Kingston, ON, Canada
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Sidney Kimmel Comprehens Canc Ctr Johns Hopkins, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
Patient-reported outcomes; Clinical encounter; Cancer; Interpretation; Guidance; Symptom monitoring; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ROUTINE PRACTICE; CARE; CANCER; HEALTH; COMMUNICATION; SCORES; PATIENTVIEWPOINT; INFORMATION; ASSESSMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.022
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: "PRO-cision Medicine,'' using patients' reports of their symptoms, functioning, and well-being to personalize their care, is becoming more prevalent. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are assessed using standardized, validated measures. Research shows that clinicians' and patients' understanding of what the PRO scores mean and how to act on them is often suboptimal. Methods to improve interpretation of PRO scores and action based on PRO results can promote more effective use of PROs in practice. Study Design and Setting: A recent supplement to Medical Care describes various approaches to address challenges in interpreting and acting on PROs in practice and therefore serves as a "PRO-cision Medicine Methods Tool kit.'' This commentary provides an overview of the supplement and identifies cross-cutting themes guided by a theoretical framework. Results: Six papers describe methods for interpreting PROs, and eight papers describe how different PRO systems address interpreting PRO scores and/or acting on PRO results. Based on the theoretical framework, cross-cutting themes are described in terms of (1) providing PRO information, (2) using PRO data, (3) screening for problems and monitoring for changes, and (4) changing management and behavior. Conclusions: The PRO-cision Medicine Methods Tool kit provides a useful resource for interpreting and acting on PRO scores to personalize patient care. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 159
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Engaging Patients and Clinicians in Online Reporting of Adverse Effects During Chemotherapy for Cancer The eRAPID System (Electronic Patient Self-Reporting of Adverse Events: Patient Information and aDvice) [J].
Absolom, Kate ;
Gibson, Andrea ;
Velikova, Galina .
MEDICAL CARE, 2019, 57 (05) :S59-S65
[2]   Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: An ad hoc task force report of the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) harmonization group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001 [J].
Acquadro, C ;
Berzon, R ;
Dubois, D ;
Leidy, NK ;
Marquis, P ;
Revicki, D ;
Rothman, M .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2003, 6 (05) :522-531
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Federal Register, V74, P65132
[4]  
Au HJ, 2010, EXPERT REV PHARM OUT, V10, P119, DOI [10.1586/erp.10.15, 10.1586/ERP.10.15]
[5]   A Decade in Review Cancer Care Ontario's Approach to Symptom Assessment and Management [J].
Barbera, Lisa ;
Moody, Lesley .
MEDICAL CARE, 2019, 57 (05) :S80-S84
[6]   Overall Survival Results of a Trial Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Treatment [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Deal, Allison M. ;
Dueck, Amylou C. ;
Scher, Howard I. ;
Kris, Mark G. ;
Hudis, Clifford ;
Schrag, Deborah .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (02) :197-198
[7]   Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Deal, Allison M. ;
Kris, Mark G. ;
Scher, Howard I. ;
Hudis, Clifford A. ;
Sabbatini, Paul ;
Rogak, Lauren ;
Bennett, Antonia V. ;
Dueck, Amylou C. ;
Atkinson, Thomas M. ;
Chou, Joanne F. ;
Dulko, Dorothy ;
Sit, Laura ;
Barz, Allison ;
Novotny, Paul ;
Fruscione, Michael ;
Sloan, Jeff A. ;
Schrag, Deborah .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (06) :557-+
[8]   Enhancing Patient-Provider Communication With the Electronic Self-Report Assessment for Cancer: A Randomized Trial [J].
Berry, Donna L. ;
Blumenstein, Brent A. ;
Halpenny, Barbara ;
Wolpin, Seth ;
Fann, Jesse R. ;
Austin-Seymour, Mary ;
Bush, Nigel ;
Karras, Bryant T. ;
Lober, William B. ;
McCorkle, Ruth .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (08) :1029-1035
[9]   Interpreting and Acting on PRO Results in Clinical Practice Lessons Learned From the PatientViewpoint System and Beyond [J].
Blackford, Amanda L. ;
Wu, Albert W. ;
Snyder, Claire .
MEDICAL CARE, 2019, 57 (05) :S46-S51
[10]   A Rasch Measurement Theory Approach to Improve the Interpretation of Patient-reported Outcomes [J].
Browne, John P. ;
Cano, Stefan J. .
MEDICAL CARE, 2019, 57 (05) :S18-S23