The Quality Adjusted Life Year A Total-Utility Perspective

Given that a properly formed utilitarian response to healthcare distribution issues should evaluate cost effectiveness against the total utility increase, it follows that any utilitarian cost-effectiveness metric should be sensitive to increases in both individual and social utility afforded by a given intervention. Quality adjusted life year (QALY) based decisionmaking in healthcare cannot track increases in social utility, and as a result, the QALY cannot be considered a strict utilitarian response to issues of healthcare distribution. This article considers arguments against, and a possible defence of, the QALY as a utilitarian concept; in response, the article offers a similar but properly formed utilitarian metric called the (IALY). This article also advances a tool called the "glee factor' (GF) on which the IALY may lean in a similar way to which the QALY leans on the Rosser Index.