Cost-Effectiveness Comparison Between the Response-Guided Therapies and Monotherapies of Nucleos(t)ide Analogues for Chronic Hepatitis B Patients in China

被引:7
作者
Lai, Keng [1 ]
Zhang, Chi [1 ]
Ke, Weixia [1 ]
Gao, Yanhui [1 ]
Zhou, Shudong [1 ]
Liu, Li [1 ]
Yang, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Pharmaceut Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 283 Jianghai Ave, Guangzhou 510310, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL FUMARATE; NUCLEOSIDE-NAIVE PATIENTS; NO DETECTABLE RESISTANCE; DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL; ADEFOVIR DIPIVOXIL; COMBINATION THERAPY; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; VIRUS INFECTION; LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION; VIROLOGICAL RESPONSE;
D O I
10.1007/s40261-016-0486-8
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background and Objective Nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) monotherapies are typically used as the primary treatment for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, including lamivudine (LAM), telbivudine (TBV), adefovir (ADV), entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir (TDF). For high-resistance NAs (LAM, TBV, ADV), they can generate excellent clinical outcomes by using response-guided therapy; however, their pharmacoeconomic profiles remain unclear in China. We aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness between response-guided therapies and monotherapies of NAs for Chinese hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive and -negative CHB patients. Methods We constructed a Markov model to simulate CHB progression associated with 12 treatment strategies using effectiveness and cost data from the published literature. We measured the lifetime costs, quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). One-way sensitivity (especially to extend the range of the TDF price) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to explore the uncertainties of the model. Results For both HBeAg-positive and -negative patients, no treatment strategy generated the lowest lifetime costs (US$31,185-US$31,338) and QALYs (7.54-7.58). ETV and TDF monotherapies were not dominated by other treatments, whereas, the ICER of ETV monotherapy was the lowest (US$6112/QALY-US$8533/QALY). For each high-resistance NA, compared with its monotherapy, the ICERs of its response-guided therapies were below the willingness-to-pay threshold of US$22,833/QALY. Additionally, TDF monotherapy was the preferred treatment when its price dropped to US$1820/year or lower. Conclusion Among 12 treatment strategies evaluated, ETV monotherapy is the most cost-effective treatment for treatment-naive CHB patients in China. The response-guided therapies of high-resistance NAs are more cost-effective than their monotherapies.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 247
页数:15
相关论文
共 83 条
[81]   Cost-effectiveness comparison of lamivudine plus adefovir combination treatment and nucleos(t)ide analog monotherapies in Chinese chronic hepatitis B patients [J].
Zhang, Chi ;
Ke, Weixia ;
Liu, Li ;
Gao, Yanhui ;
Yao, Zhenjiang ;
Ye, Xiaohua ;
Zhou, Shudong ;
Yang, Yi .
DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2016, 10 :897-910
[82]   Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Antiviral Therapies for Hepatitis B e Antigen-Positive Chronic Hepatitis B Patients in China [J].
Zhang, Chi ;
Ke, Weixia ;
Gao, Yanhui ;
Zhou, Shudong ;
Liu, Li ;
Ye, Xiaohua ;
Yao, Zhenjiang ;
Yang, Yi .
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2015, 35 (03) :197-209
[83]   Annual economic burden of hepatitis B virus-related diseases among hospitalized patients in twelve cities in China [J].
Zhang, S. ;
Ma, Q. ;
Liang, S. ;
Xiao, H. ;
Zhuang, G. ;
Zou, Y. ;
Tan, H. ;
Liu, J. ;
Zhang, Y. ;
Zhang, L. ;
Feng, X. ;
Xue, L. ;
Hu, D. ;
Cui, F. ;
Liang, X. .
JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS, 2016, 23 (03) :202-210