RANDOM PREDICTOR MODELS FOR RIGOROUS UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION

被引:17
作者
Crespo, Luis G. [1 ]
Kenny, Sean P. [1 ]
Giesy, Daniel P. [1 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Hampton, VA 23681 USA
关键词
uncertainty quantification; representation of uncertainty; stochastic response surface method; random process; parameter estimation; optimization; RELIABILITY; DESIGN; OPTIMIZATION; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2015013799
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper proposes techniques for constructing linear parametric models describing key features of the distribution of an output variable given input-output data. By contrast to standard models, which yield a single output value at each value of the input, random predictors models (RPMs) yield a random variable. The strategies proposed yield models in which the mean, the variance, and the range of the model's parameters, thus, of the random process describing the output, are rigorously prescribed. As such, these strategies encompass all RPMs conforming to the prescription of these metrics (e.g., random variables and probability boxes describing the model's parameters, and random processes describing the output). Strategies for calculating optimal RPMs by solving a sequence of optimization programs are developed. The RPMs are optimal in the sense that they yield the tightest output ranges containing all (or, depending on the formulation, most) of the observations. Extensions that enable eliminating the effects of outliers in the data set are developed. When the data-generating mechanism is stationary, the data are independent, and the optimization program(s) used to calculate the RPM is convex (or, when its solution coincides with the solution to an auxiliary convex program), the reliability of the prediction, which is the probability that a future observation would fall within the predicted output range, is bounded rigorously using Scenario Optimization Theory. The reliability of the prediction, which is the probability that a future observation would fall within the predicted output range, is bounded rigorously via the scenario approach. This framework does not require making any assumptions on the underlying structure of the data-generating mechanism.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 489
页数:21
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Reliability-based design optimization of aeroelastic structures [J].
Allen, M ;
Maute, K .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2004, 27 (04) :228-242
[2]  
[Anonymous], 12 AIAA ISSMO MULT A
[3]   The scenario approach to robust control design [J].
Calafiore, Giuseppe C. ;
Campi, Marco C. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2006, 51 (05) :742-753
[4]   A Sampling-and-Discarding Approach to Chance-Constrained Optimization: Feasibility and Optimality [J].
Campi, M. C. ;
Garatti, S. .
JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2011, 148 (02) :257-280
[5]   THE EXACT FEASIBILITY OF RANDOMIZED SOLUTIONS OF UNCERTAIN CONVEX PROGRAMS [J].
Campi, M. C. ;
Garatti, S. .
SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 2008, 19 (03) :1211-1230
[6]   Interval predictor models: Identification and reliability [J].
Campi, M. C. ;
Calafiore, G. ;
Garatti, S. .
AUTOMATICA, 2009, 45 (02) :382-392
[7]   COST HORIZONS AND CERTAINTY EQUIVALENTS - AN APPROACH TO STOCHASTIC-PROGRAMMING OF HEATING OIL [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
SYMONDS, GH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1958, 4 (03) :235-263
[8]  
Crespo L. G., 2015, 18 AIAA NOND APPR C
[9]  
Crespo LG., 2016, J VERIF VALID UNCERT, V1, P1
[10]   Investigation of reliability method formulations in DAKOTA/UQ [J].
Eldred, M. S. ;
Agarwal, H. ;
Perez, V. M. ;
Wojtkiewicz, S. F., Jr. ;
Renaud, J. E. .
STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2007, 3 (03) :199-213