Implementing an online radiotherapy quality assurance programme with supporting continuous medical education - report from the EMBRACE-II evaluation of cervix cancer IMRT contouring

被引:23
作者
Duke, Simon L. [1 ,2 ]
Tan, Li-Tee [1 ]
Jensen, Nina B. K. [3 ]
Rumpold, Tamara [4 ]
De Leeuw, Astrid A. C. [5 ]
Kirisits, Christian [4 ]
Lindegaard, Jacob C. [3 ]
Tanderup, Kari [3 ]
Potter, Richard C. [4 ]
Nout, Remi A. [6 ]
Jurgenliemk-Schulz, Ina M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Cambridge Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham, England
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Radiotherapy, Vienna, Austria
[5] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Erasmus MC, Dept Radiat Oncol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Cervical cancer; Radiotherapy; Delineation; Quality assurance; Intensity modulated radiotherapy; Education; EMBRACE-II; Online; CLINICAL TARGET VOLUME; MODULATED PELVIC RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION ONCOLOGY; CONSENSUS GUIDELINES; LYMPH-NODES; NECK-CANCER; DELINEATION; IMPACT; HEAD; BRACHYTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2020.02.017
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: EMBRACE-II is an international prospective study of IMRT and MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in locally advanced cervix cancer. An online radiotherapy quality assurance (RTQA) programme with minimal data transfer and supporting continuing medical education (CME) was implemented for IMRT contouring. Materials and methods: Participant contours for six volumes-of-interest (VOIs) on one benchmark case were scored (2 = excellent, 1 = fair, 0 = revision required) against a consensus reference contour. For contours receiving a 0 or 1 score, additional qualitative comments were provided. The Jaccard conformity index (JCI) was retrospectively calculated. User interaction with CME content (pre-accreditation questionnaire, contouring atlas, practice cases, quizzes, internal target volume (ITV-T) guide) was analysed. Results: 78 clinicians submitted contours for evaluation. 41% passed at the first attempt, 44% after one revision and 6% after two or more revisions. 9% did not re-submit after failing. The lowest mean scores were for the elective nodal CTV (CTV-E) (1.01/2) and ITV-T (1.06/2). 60 different errors across the six VOIs were identified; five potentially had high impact on loco-regional control. A JCI cut-off of 0.7 would have identified 87% contours that failed expert assessment, but also excluded 54% of passing contours. 39 clinicians responded to the pre-accreditation questionnaire - 36% anticipated difficulties with the ITV-T and 13% with the CTV-E. 35% clinicians contoured on the practice cases, 17% answered a quiz, 96% used the atlas and 38% the ITV-T guide. Conclusion: Expert evaluation with qualitative feedback improved contouring compliance. The JCI is not a reliable alternative to expert assessment. Moderate uptake of optional CME content limited evaluation. Crown Copyright (c) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 147 (2020) 22-29
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 29
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, MATLAB
[2]   PATTERNS OF REGIONAL RECURRENCE AFTER DEFINITIVE RADIOTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL CANCER [J].
Beadle, Beth M. ;
Jhingran, Anuja ;
Yom, Sue S. ;
Ramirez, Pedro T. ;
Eifel, Patricia J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (05) :1396-1403
[3]   Redesigning Radiotherapy Quality Assurance: Opportunities to Develop an Efficient, Evidence-Based System to Support Clinical Trials-Report of the National Cancer Institute Work Group on Radiotherapy Quality Assurance [J].
Bekelman, Justin E. ;
Deye, James A. ;
Vikram, Bhadrasain ;
Bentzen, Soren M. ;
Bruner, Deborah ;
Curran, Walter J., Jr. ;
Dignam, James ;
Efstathiou, Jason A. ;
FitzGerald, T. J. ;
Hurkmans, Coen ;
Ibbott, Geoffrey S. ;
Lee, J. Jack ;
Merchant, Thomas E. ;
Michalski, Jeff ;
Palta, Jatinder R. ;
Simon, Richard ;
Ten Haken, Randal K. ;
Timmerman, Robert ;
Tunis, Sean ;
Coleman, C. Norman ;
Purdy, James .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (03) :782-790
[4]   Systematic review of educational interventions to improve contouring in radiotherapy [J].
Cacicedo, Jon ;
Navarro-Martin, Arturo ;
Gonzalez-Larragan, Susana ;
De Bari, Berardino ;
Salem, Ahmed ;
Dahele, Max .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 144 :86-92
[5]   Challenges for Quality Assurance of Target volume Delineation in Clinical Trials [J].
Chang, Amy Tien Yee ;
Tan, Li Tee ;
Duke, Simon ;
Ng, Wai-Tong .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2017, 7
[6]   MARGINAL MISSES AFTER POSTOPERATIVE INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR HEAD AND NECK CANCER [J].
Chen, Allen M. ;
Farwell, D. Gregory ;
Luu, Quang ;
Chen, Leon M. ;
Vijayakumar, Srinivasan ;
Purdy, James A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 80 (05) :1423-1429
[7]   Optimal Extent of Prophylactic Irradiation of Paraaortic Lymph Nodes in Patients with Uterine Cervical Cancer [J].
Choi, Jinhyun ;
Yoon, Hong In ;
Lee, Jeongshim ;
Keum, Ki Chang ;
Kim, Gwi Eon ;
Kim, Yong Bae .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (12)
[8]   Educational Technologies for Physician Continuous Professional Development: A National Survey [J].
Cook, David A. ;
Blachman, Morris J. ;
Price, David W. ;
West, Colin P. ;
Thomas, Barbara L. Baasch ;
Berger, Richard A. ;
Wittich, Christopher M. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2018, 93 (01) :104-112
[9]   Impact of deviations in target volume delineation - Time for a new RTQA approach? [J].
Cox, Samantha ;
Cleves, Anne ;
Clementel, Enrico ;
Miles, Elizabeth ;
Staffurth, John ;
Gwynne, Sarah .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 137 :1-8
[10]   Short interactive workshops reduce variability in contouring treatment volumes for spine stereotactic body radiation therapy: Experience with the ESTRO FALCON programme and EduCase™ training tool [J].
De Bari, Berardino ;
Dahele, Max ;
Palmu, Miika ;
Kaylor, Scott ;
Schiappacasse, Luis ;
Guckenberger, Matthias .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 (01) :150-153