Predicting hypertension onset from longitudinal electronic health records with deep learning

被引:11
作者
Datta, Suparno [1 ,2 ]
Morassi Sasso, Ariane [1 ,2 ]
Kiwit, Nina [1 ]
Bose, Subhronil [1 ]
Nadkarni, Girish [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Miotto, Riccardo [2 ,4 ]
Boettinger, Erwin P. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Hasso Plattner Inst, Digital Hlth Ctr, Potsdam, Germany
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Hasso Plattner Inst Digital Hlth Mt Sinai, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[4] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Genet & Genom Sci, New York, NY 10029 USA
[5] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Windreich Dept Artificial Intelligence & Human Hl, New York, NY 10029 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
machine learning; electronic health records; deep learning; hypertension; HIGH BLOOD-PRESSURE; INCIDENT HYPERTENSION; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; RISK; PREVENTION; MANAGEMENT; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac097
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Hypertension has long been recognized as one of the most important predisposing factors for cardiovascular diseases and mortality. In recent years, machine learning methods have shown potential in diagnostic and predictive approaches in chronic diseases. Electronic health records (EHRs) have emerged as a reliable source of longitudinal data. The aim of this study is to predict the onset of hypertension using modern deep learning (DL) architectures, specifically long short-term memory (LSTM) networks, and longitudinal EHRs. Materials and Methods: We compare this approach to the best performing models reported from previous works, particularly XGboost, applied to aggregated features. Our work is based on data from 233 895 adult patients from a large health system in the United States. We divided our population into 2 distinct longitudinal datasets based on the diagnosis date. To ensure generalization to unseen data, we trained our models on the first dataset (dataset A "train and validation") using cross-validation, and then applied the models to a second dataset (dataset B "test") to assess their performance. We also experimented with 2 different time-windows before the onset of hypertension and evaluated the impact on model performance. Results: With the LSTM network, we were able to achieve an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.98 in the "train and validation" dataset A and 0.94 in the "test" dataset B for a prediction time window of 1 year. Lipid disorders, type 2 diabetes, and renal disorders are found to be associated with incident hypertension. Conclusion: These findings show that DL models based on temporal EHR data can improve the identification of patients at high risk of hypertension and corresponding driving factors. In the long term, this work may support identifying individuals who are at high risk for developing hypertension and facilitate earlier intervention to prevent the future development of hypertension.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Deep learning on time series laboratory test results from electronic health records for early detection of pancreatic cancer
    Park, Jiheum
    Artin, Michael G.
    Lee, Kate E.
    Pumpalova, Yoanna S.
    Ingram, Myles A.
    May, Benjamin L.
    Park, Michael
    Hur, Chin
    Tatonetti, Nicholas P.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 131
  • [22] Deep learning for electronic health records: A comparative review of multiple deep neural architectures
    Solares, Jose Roberto Ayala
    Raimondi, Francesca Elisa Diletta
    Zhu, Yajie
    Rahimian, Fatemeh
    Canoy, Dexter
    Tran, Jenny
    Gomes, Ana Catarina Pinho
    Payberah, Amir H.
    Zottoli, Mariagrazia
    Nazarzadeh, Milad
    Conrad, Nathalie
    Rahimi, Kazem
    Salimi-Khorshidi, Gholamreza
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2020, 101
  • [23] Predicting opioid overdose risk of patients with opioid prescriptions using electronic health records based on temporal deep learning
    Dong, Xinyu
    Deng, Jianyuan
    Hou, Wei
    Rashidian, Sina
    Rosenthal, Richard N.
    Saltz, Mary
    Saltz, Joel H.
    Wang, Fusheng
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2021, 116
  • [24] Deep Learning Analysis of Polish Electronic Health Records for Diagnosis Prediction in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases
    Anetta, Kristof
    Horak, Ales
    Wojakowski, Wojciech
    Wita, Krystian
    Jadczyk, Tomasz
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [25] Identification of an ANCA-associated vasculitis cohort using deep learning and electronic health records
    Wang, Liqin
    Novoa-Laurentiev, John
    Cook, Claire
    Srivatsan, Shruthi
    Hua, Yining
    Yang, Jie
    Miloslavsky, Eli
    Choi, Hyon K.
    Zhou, Li
    Wallace, Zachary S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2025, 196
  • [26] Identifying Reasons for Statin Nonuse in Patients With Diabetes Using Deep Learning of Electronic Health Records
    Sarraju, Ashish
    Zammit, Alban
    Ngo, Summer
    Witting, Celeste
    Hernandez-Boussard, Tina
    Rodriguez, Fatima
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2023, 12 (07):
  • [27] Predicting Hospital Readmission for Campylobacteriosis from Electronic Health Records: A Machine Learning and Text Mining Perspective
    Zhou, Shang-Ming
    Lyons, Ronan A.
    Rahman, Muhammad A.
    Holborow, Alexander
    Brophy, Sinead
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [28] Improving Hypertension Quality Measurement Using Electronic Health Records
    Persell, Stephen D.
    Kho, Abel N.
    Thompson, Jason A.
    Baker, David W.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2009, 47 (04) : 388 - 394
  • [29] Predicting polycystic ovary syndrome with machine learning algorithms from electronic health records
    Zad, Zahra
    Jiang, Victoria S.
    Wolf, Amber T.
    Wang, Taiyao
    Cheng, J. Jojo
    Paschalidis, Ioannis Ch.
    Mahalingaiah, Shruthi
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [30] Treatment effect prediction with adversarial deep learning using electronic health records
    Chu, Jiebin
    Dong, Wei
    Wang, Jinliang
    He, Kunlun
    Huang, Zhengxing
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2020, 20 (Suppl 4)