Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (LIS): Authors, institutions, and network structures

被引:27
作者
Bauer, Johann [1 ]
Leydesdorff, Loet [2 ]
Bornmann, Lutz [3 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Biochem, Informat Serv, Klopferspitz 18, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany
[2] Univ Amsterdam, ASCoR, POB 15793, NL-1001 NG Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Max Planck Gesell, Adm Headquarters, Div Sci & Innovat Studies, Hofgartenstr 8, D-80539 Munich, Germany
关键词
bibliometrics; citation analysis; ARTICLES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/asi.23568
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
As a follow-up to the highly cited authors list published by Thomson Reuters in June 2014, we analyzed the top 1% most frequently cited papers published between 2002 and 2012 included in the Web of Science (WoS) subject category Information Science & Library Science. In all, 798 authors contributed to 305 top 1% publications; these authors were employed at 275 institutions. The authors at Harvard University contributed the largest number of papers, when the addresses are whole-number counted. However, Leiden University leads the ranking if fractional counting is used. Twenty-three of the 798 authors were also listed as most highly cited authors by Thomson Reuters in June 2014 (). Twelve of these 23 authors were involved in publishing 4 or more of the 305 papers under study. Analysis of coauthorship relations among the 798 highly cited scientists shows that coauthorships are based on common interests in a specific topic. Three topics were important between 2002 and 2012: (a) collection and exploitation of information in clinical practices; (b) use of the Internet in public communication and commerce; and (c) scientometrics.
引用
收藏
页码:3095 / 3100
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Are the authors of highly cited articles also the most productive ones? [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
Cicero, Tindaro ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2014, 8 (01) :89-97
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, EXPLORATORY SOCIAL N, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511996368
[3]   The distribution of partnership returns: Evidence from co-authorships in economics journals [J].
Bidault, Francis ;
Hildebrand, Thomas .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (06) :1002-1013
[4]  
Bornmann L., J ASS INFOR IN PRESS
[5]   How are excellent (highly cited) papers defined in bibliometrics? A quantitative analysis of the literature [J].
Bornmann, Lutz .
RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2014, 23 (02) :166-173
[6]   The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Leydesdorff, Loet ;
Mutz, Ruediger .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2013, 7 (01) :158-165
[7]   Do Scientific Advancements Lean on the Shoulders of Giants? A Bibliometric Investigation of the Ortega Hypothesis [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
de Moya Anegon, Felix ;
Leydesdorff, Loet .
PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (10)
[8]  
Hazen A., 1914, T AM SOC CIVIL ENG, V77, P1539, DOI [10.1061/taceat.0002563, DOI 10.1061/TACEAT.0002563]
[9]   AN ALGORITHM FOR DRAWING GENERAL UNDIRECTED GRAPHS [J].
KAMADA, T ;
KAWAI, S .
INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS, 1989, 31 (01) :7-15
[10]   The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity [J].
Lee, S ;
Bozeman, B .
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 2005, 35 (05) :673-702