Cultural Differences and Similarities in Request Rejection A Situational Approach

被引:3
作者
Cheng, Cecilia [1 ]
Chun, Woo Young [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Psychol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
assertiveness; cross-cultural comparison; culture; social behavior;
D O I
10.1177/0022022108323808
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Using global measures, most studies have shown that Caucasian Americans were more assertive than Chinese. Adopting a situational approach, three studies were conducted to examine situational differences and similarities in request rejection, and its underlying mechanisms for Caucasian Americans and Chinese. Results revealed that (a) Caucasian Americans were more likely to reject requests of moderate legitimacy than Chinese; (b) both cultural groups were similar in request rejection in high- and low-legitimacy situations; (c) both cultural groups were more likely to reject a request when considering their needs and rights, but less likely to reject a request when considering their relationship with the requester; and (d) the self-model of request rejection was more salient for Caucasian Americans but the relational model of request rejection was more salient for Chinese in moderate-legitimacy situations.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 764
页数:20
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EQS WINDOWS USERS GU
[2]  
[Anonymous], J PSYCHOL CHINESE SO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Journal of Sport Behavior
[4]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOL EVALUATION G
[5]  
[Anonymous], COMMUNICATION APPREH
[6]  
AOKI T, 1990, TRANSITION WORLD SIT
[7]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
[8]  
Bresnahan Mary Jiang, 2001, J ASIAN PACIFIC COMM, V11.2, P135
[9]  
Brislin R.W., 1986, FIELD METHOD CROSS C, P137, DOI DOI 10.1177/017084068800900318
[10]  
BURNS RB, 2001, MAKING ASSERTIVENESS