Metrological intercomparison of six terrestrial laser scanning systems

被引：7

作者：

Gonzalez-Jorge, Higinio ^{[1
]}

Rodriguez-Gonzalvez, Pablo ^{[2
,3
]}

Shen, Yueqian ^{[4
]}

Laguela, Susana ^{[2
]}

Diaz-Vilarino, Lucia ^{[1
]}

Lindenbergh, Roderik ^{[4
]}

Gonzalez-Aguilera, Diego ^{[2
]}

Arias, Pedro ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Vigo, Sch Min & Energy Engn, Galician Aerosp Innovat Ctr CINAE, Geotech Grp, Vigo 36310, Spain

[2] Univ Salamanca, Dept Cartog & Land Engn, Polytech Sch Avila, Hornos Caleros 50, Avila 05003, Spain

[3] Univ Leon, Dept Min Technol Topog & Struct, Avda Astorga S-N, Ponferrada 24401, Spain

[4] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Geosci & Remote Sensing, Stevinweg 1, NL-2628 CN Delft, Netherlands

来源：

IET SCIENCE MEASUREMENT & TECHNOLOGY | 2018年 / 12卷 / 02期

关键词：

optical scanners; remote sensing by laser beam; three-dimensional printing; terrestrial laser scanning systems; phase shift; time of flight scanners; three-dimensional printing spheres; metrological intercomparison; MICROSOFT KINECT; VERIFICATION; REGISTRATION; DEFORMATION; RESOLUTION; SENSORS;

D O I：

10.1049/iet-smt.2017.0209

中图分类号：

TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];

学科分类号：

0808 ; 0809 ;

摘要：

Intercomparison among six terrestrial laser scanner systems focused on the measurement of small elements (<0.5m) is performed. Phase shift (PS) and time of flight (ToF) scanners are considered. Two standard artefacts containing three-dimensional printing spheres and steps of variable height are used for the experiment. Results show errors between -4.5 and 3.5mm in the measurement of distances between step planes. The most stable systems for measuring small elements seem the Leica C10, Faro Photon and Riegl LMS Z390i. The quality of the results is linked to the overall quality of the system rather than the specific technology used for range measurement (PS or ToF) which does not appear to be a determining factor.

引用

页码：218 / 222

页数：5

共 25 条

[1] Detection of millimetric deformation using a terrestrial laser scanner: experiment and application to a rockfall event
Abellan, A.
Jaboyedoff, M.
Oppikofer, T.
Vilaplana, J. M.
[J]. NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2009, 9 (02) : 365 - 372
[2] Amiri Parian J., 2005, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAM 3, V36, P18
[3] A methodological intercomparison of topographic survey techniques for characterizing wadeable streams and rivers
Bangen, Sara G.
Wheaton, Joseph M.
Bouwes, Nicolaas
Bouwes, Boyd
Jordan, Chris
[J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2014, 206 : 343 - 361
[4] Boehler W., 2003, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMME, V34, P696, DOI [DOI 10.1002/PBC.ABSTRACT, 10.1002/pbc.ABSTRACT]
[5] Evaluation of point cloud registration using Monte Carlo method
Bueno, M.
Gonzalez-Jorge, H.
Martinez-Sanchez, J.
Diaz-Vilarino, L.
Arias, P.
[J]. MEASUREMENT, 2016, 92 : 264 - 270
[6] Metrological evaluation of KinectFusion and its comparison with Microsoft Kinect sensor
Bueno, M.
Diaz-Vilarino, L.
Martinez-Sanchez, J.
Gonzalez-Jorge, H.
Lorenzo, H.
Arias, P.
[J]. MEASUREMENT, 2015, 73 : 137 - 145
[7] The contribution of laser scanning technology in the estimation of ancient Greek monuments' deformations
Georgopoulos, G. D.
Telioni, E. C.
Tsontzou, A.
[J]. SURVEY REVIEW, 2016, 48 (349) : 303 - 308
[8] Trimble GX200 and Riegl LMS-Z390i sensor self-calibration
Gonzalez-Aguilera, D.
Rodriguez-Gonzalvez, P.
Armesto, J.
Arias, P.
[J]. OPTICS EXPRESS, 2011, 19 (03): : 2676 - 2693
[9] Metrological comparison between Kinect I and Kinect II sensors
Gonzalez-Jorge, H.
Rodriguez-Gonzalvez, P.
Martinez-Sanchez, J.
Gonzalez-Aguilera, D.
Arias, P.
Gesto, M.
Diaz-Vilarino, L.
[J]. MEASUREMENT, 2015, 70 : 21 - 26
[10] Metrological evaluation of Microsoft Kinect and Asus Xtion sensors
Gonzalez-Jorge, H.
Riveiro, B.
Vazquez-Fernandez, E.
Martinez-Sanchez, J.
Arias, P.
[J]. MEASUREMENT, 2013, 46 (06) : 1800 - 1806

← 1 2 3 →