Estimation of near-surface shear-wave velocities and quality factors using multichannel analysis of surface-wave methods

被引:128
|
作者
Xia, Jianghai [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Inst Geophys & Geomat, Subsurface Imaging & Sensing Lab, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci, Inst Geophys & Geomat, Subsurface Multiscale Imaging Lab, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Rayleigh wave; Love wave; MASW; MALW; Shear-wave velocity; Quality factor; RAYLEIGH-WAVES; POROELASTIC MEDIA; DISPERSIVE ENERGY; ATTENUATION; INVERSION; RESOLUTION; DECOMPOSITION; FEASIBILITY; TOPOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.01.016
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This overview article gives a picture of multichannel analysis of high-frequency surface (Rayleigh and Love) waves developed mainly by research scientists at the Kansas Geological Survey, the University of Kansas and China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) during the last eighteen years by discussing dispersion imaging techniques, inversion systems, and real-world examples. Shear (S)-wave velocities of near-surface materials can be derived from inverting the dispersive phase velocities of high-frequency surface waves. Multichannel analysis of surface waves-MASW used phase information of high-frequency Rayleigh waves recorded on vertical component geophones to determine near-surface S-wave velocities. The differences between MASW results and direct borehole measurements are approximately 15% or less and random. Studies show that inversion with higher modes and the fundamental mode simultaneously can increase model resolution and an investigation depth. Multichannel analysis of Love waves-MALW used phase information of high-frequency Love waves recorded on horizontal (perpendicular to the direction of wave propagation) component geophones to determine S-wave velocities of shallow materials. Because of independence of compressional (P)-wave velocity, the MALW method has some attractive advantages, such as 1) Love-wave dispersion curves are simpler than Rayleigh wave's; 2) dispersion images of Love-wave energy have a higher signal to noise ratio and more focused than those generated from Rayleigh waves; and 3) inversion of Love-wave dispersion curves is less dependent on initial models and more stable than Rayleigh waves. To derive S-wave velocities of near-surface materials from high-frequency surface waves only utilizes their phase information. Feasibility of using their amplitude information to estimate near-surface quality factors (Q(s), and/or Q(p)) has been studied. Attenuation coefficients of high-frequency surface (Rayleigh and/or Love) waves can be calculated from their amplitude. And by inverting attenuation coefficients, it is feasible to obtain quality factors. Similar to inverting phase velocities of Love waves for S-wave velocities, attenuation coefficients of Love waves are independent of Q(p), Which makes inversion of attenuation coefficients of Love waves to estimate Q(s) simpler than that of Rayleigh waves. Both MASW and MALW methods to estimate near-surface S-wave velocities are non-invasive, non-destructive, environment-friendly, low-cost, fast, and in situ seismic methods and possess stable and efficient inversion algorithms to invert phase velocities of surface waves. Real world examples demonstrated that near-surface S-wave velocities derived from phase information are reliable and that methods discussed in the paper to estimate nearsurface quality factors from amplitude information are feasible.(C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 151
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stacking of multilayout and multichannel surface-wave data on the f-k domain
    Coelho, Maria Joao
    Santos, Jaime
    Pereira, Marilia
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 159 : 93 - 107
  • [32] A review of near-surface QS estimation methods using active and passive sources
    Parolai, Stefano
    Lai, Carlo G.
    Dreossi, Ilaria
    Ktenidou, Olga-Joan
    Yong, Alan
    JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2022, 26 (04) : 823 - 862
  • [33] Surface-wave testing of soil sites using multichannel simulation with one-receiver
    Lin, Shibin
    Ashlock, Jeramy C.
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2016, 87 : 82 - 92
  • [34] High-Resolution Characterization of Near-Surface Structures by Surface-Wave Inversions: From Dispersion Curve to Full Waveform
    Yudi Pan
    Lingli Gao
    Thomas Bohlen
    Surveys in Geophysics, 2019, 40 : 167 - 195
  • [35] Near-surface shear-wave velocity structure using time-frequency seismic noise cross-correlation in Ciudad Universitaria, Puebla, Mexico
    Bruno Olivares-Palomares, A.
    Aguirre, Jorge
    Pina-Flores, Jose
    Ferrer-Toledo, Hugo
    Ontiveros-Castro, Alejandro
    JOURNAL OF SOUTH AMERICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2022, 118
  • [36] Application of Surface-Wave Methods for Seismic Site Characterization
    Foti, Sebastiano
    Parolai, Stefano
    Albarello, Dario
    Picozzi, Matteo
    SURVEYS IN GEOPHYSICS, 2011, 32 (06) : 777 - 825
  • [37] Estimating Near-Surface Shear-Wave-Velocity Structures Via Multichannel Analysis of Rayleigh and Love Waves: An Experiment at the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site
    Binbin Mi
    Jianghai Xia
    John H. Bradford
    Chao Shen
    Surveys in Geophysics, 2020, 41 : 323 - 341
  • [38] Application of Surface-Wave Methods for Seismic Site Characterization
    Sebastiano Foti
    Stefano Parolai
    Dario Albarello
    Matteo Picozzi
    Surveys in Geophysics, 2011, 32 : 777 - 825
  • [39] Quantitative estimation of minimum offset for multichannel surface-wave survey with actively exciting source
    Xu, Yixian
    Xia, Jianghai
    Miller, Richard D.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2006, 59 (02) : 117 - 125
  • [40] Shear Wave Velocity Estimation of the Near-surface Sediments of Bangkok and Vicinity, Thailand for Seismic Site Characterization
    Naksawee, Aomboon
    Hayashi, Koichi
    Pananont, Passakorn
    CHIANG MAI JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2016, 43 (06): : 1269 - 1278