Estimation of near-surface shear-wave velocities and quality factors using multichannel analysis of surface-wave methods

被引:128
|
作者
Xia, Jianghai [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Inst Geophys & Geomat, Subsurface Imaging & Sensing Lab, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci, Inst Geophys & Geomat, Subsurface Multiscale Imaging Lab, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Rayleigh wave; Love wave; MASW; MALW; Shear-wave velocity; Quality factor; RAYLEIGH-WAVES; POROELASTIC MEDIA; DISPERSIVE ENERGY; ATTENUATION; INVERSION; RESOLUTION; DECOMPOSITION; FEASIBILITY; TOPOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.01.016
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This overview article gives a picture of multichannel analysis of high-frequency surface (Rayleigh and Love) waves developed mainly by research scientists at the Kansas Geological Survey, the University of Kansas and China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) during the last eighteen years by discussing dispersion imaging techniques, inversion systems, and real-world examples. Shear (S)-wave velocities of near-surface materials can be derived from inverting the dispersive phase velocities of high-frequency surface waves. Multichannel analysis of surface waves-MASW used phase information of high-frequency Rayleigh waves recorded on vertical component geophones to determine near-surface S-wave velocities. The differences between MASW results and direct borehole measurements are approximately 15% or less and random. Studies show that inversion with higher modes and the fundamental mode simultaneously can increase model resolution and an investigation depth. Multichannel analysis of Love waves-MALW used phase information of high-frequency Love waves recorded on horizontal (perpendicular to the direction of wave propagation) component geophones to determine S-wave velocities of shallow materials. Because of independence of compressional (P)-wave velocity, the MALW method has some attractive advantages, such as 1) Love-wave dispersion curves are simpler than Rayleigh wave's; 2) dispersion images of Love-wave energy have a higher signal to noise ratio and more focused than those generated from Rayleigh waves; and 3) inversion of Love-wave dispersion curves is less dependent on initial models and more stable than Rayleigh waves. To derive S-wave velocities of near-surface materials from high-frequency surface waves only utilizes their phase information. Feasibility of using their amplitude information to estimate near-surface quality factors (Q(s), and/or Q(p)) has been studied. Attenuation coefficients of high-frequency surface (Rayleigh and/or Love) waves can be calculated from their amplitude. And by inverting attenuation coefficients, it is feasible to obtain quality factors. Similar to inverting phase velocities of Love waves for S-wave velocities, attenuation coefficients of Love waves are independent of Q(p), Which makes inversion of attenuation coefficients of Love waves to estimate Q(s) simpler than that of Rayleigh waves. Both MASW and MALW methods to estimate near-surface S-wave velocities are non-invasive, non-destructive, environment-friendly, low-cost, fast, and in situ seismic methods and possess stable and efficient inversion algorithms to invert phase velocities of surface waves. Real world examples demonstrated that near-surface S-wave velocities derived from phase information are reliable and that methods discussed in the paper to estimate nearsurface quality factors from amplitude information are feasible.(C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 151
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Estimation of near-surface shear-wave velocity using multichannel analysis of Love waves (MALW)
    Xia, Jianghai
    Miller, Richard D.
    Cakir, Recep
    Luo, Yinhe
    Xu, Yixian
    Zeng, Chong
    NEAR-SURFACE GEOPHYSICS AND GEOHAZARDS - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENGINEERING GEOPHYSICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2010, : 13 - 24
  • [2] Near-surface shear-wave velocity estimation based on surface-wave inversion
    Li P.
    Zhang K.
    Zhang Y.
    Yan Z.
    Leading Edge, 2016, 35 (11) : 940 - 945
  • [3] Advantages of Using Multichannel Analysis of Love Waves (MALW) to Estimate Near-Surface Shear-Wave Velocity
    Xia, Jianghai
    Xu, Yixian
    Luo, Yinhe
    Miller, Richard D.
    Cakir, Recep
    Zeng, Chong
    SURVEYS IN GEOPHYSICS, 2012, 33 (05) : 841 - 860
  • [4] Advantages of Using Multichannel Analysis of Love Waves (MALW) to Estimate Near-Surface Shear-Wave Velocity
    Jianghai Xia
    Yixian Xu
    Yinhe Luo
    Richard D. Miller
    Recep Cakir
    Chong Zeng
    Surveys in Geophysics, 2012, 33 : 841 - 860
  • [5] Practical considerations for array-based surface-wave testing methods with respect to near-field effects and shear-wave velocity profiles
    Tremblay, Simon-Pierre
    Karray, Mourad
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 171
  • [6] Estimation of Near-surface Shear-wave Velocity and Quality Factor by Inversion of High-frequency Rayleigh Waves
    Xia, Jianghai
    Miller, Richard D.
    ADVANCES IN NEAR-SURFACE SEISMOLOGY AND GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR, 2010, 15 : 17 - 36
  • [7] Estimation of Near-surface Quality Factors Using Constrained Inversion of Rayleigh-wave Attenuation Coefficients
    Xia, Jianghai
    Xu, Yixian
    Miller, Richard D.
    Ivanov, Julian
    NEAR-SURFACE GEOPHYSICS AND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION, 2012, : 176 - 181
  • [8] Investigation and Use of Surface-wave Characteristics for Near-surface Applications
    Xu, Yixian
    Luo, Yinhe
    Liang, Qing
    Wang, Liming
    Song, Xianhai
    Liu, Jiangping
    Chen, Chao
    Gu, Hanming
    ADVANCES IN NEAR-SURFACE SEISMOLOGY AND GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR, 2010, 15 : 37 - 54
  • [9] Automatic and adaptive picking of surface-wave dispersion curves for near-surface application
    Liu, Hui
    Li, Jing
    Hu, Rong
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2024, 221
  • [10] Near-surface attenuation modelling based on rock shear-wave velocity profile
    Chandler, A. M.
    Lam, N. T. K.
    Tsang, H. H.
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2006, 26 (11) : 1004 - 1014