Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach

被引:105
作者
Herrenkohl, LR
Palincsar, AS
DeWater, LS
Kawasaki, K
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Seattle Publ Sch, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s15327809jls0803&4_4
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The focus of this research is the role and value of scaffolding student discussions in advancing students' ability to co-construct theories and models from data they have collected while investigating floating and sinking. Three principles, derived from a sociocognitive perspective on science teaching and learning, undergird this instruction: (a) engaging students in reasoning practices in science, (b) offering explicit guidance on the roles students can assume to monitor their own and their peers' thinking, and (c) fostering a sophisticated epistemology of science by having students experience science as a process of revision. The participants were members of a Grade 3/4 split-level gifted class and a Grade 5 class in an urban district. Instruction occurred over a 10-week period, in which students worked in small-group and whole-class contexts to develop and refine explanations for floating and sinking. Pre- and postassessment data revealed changes in children's conceptual understanding, as well as changes in their beliefs about the nature of scientific problem solving. The primary data were transcripts of whore-class discussions that were analyzed to reveal how children's notions of theorizing evolved over the course of the program of study through a process of negotiation that was significantly guided by the teachers, supported by the roles that students assumed, and assisted with the use of an array of tools, such as theory and question charts, as well as the investigative activity itself.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 493
页数:43
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Airasian PW, 1997, PHI DELTA KAPPAN, V78, P444
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, NATL SCI ED STANDARD
[3]  
Brewer W. F., 1991, Cognition and the symbolic processes: Applied and ecological perspectives, P209
[4]   ON UNDERSTANDING THE NATURE OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE [J].
CAREY, S ;
SMITH, C .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 1993, 28 (03) :235-251
[5]  
Cazden C.B., 1988, CLASSR DISCOURSE
[6]   Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change [J].
Chan, C ;
Burtis, J ;
Bereiter, C .
COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 1997, 15 (01) :1-40
[7]   THE ROLE OF ANOMALOUS DATA IN KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION - A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND IMPLICATIONS FOR SCIENCE INSTRUCTION [J].
CHINN, CA ;
BREWER, WF .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1993, 63 (01) :1-49
[8]  
Driver R., 1994, Educational Researcher, V23, P5, DOI [DOI 10.3102/0013189X023007005, 10.3102/0013189X023007005]
[9]  
EASLEY J, 1990, SCI ED MINDS ON APPR, P61
[10]   UNDERSTANDING MODELS AND THEIR USE IN SCIENCE - CONCEPTIONS OF MIDDLE AND HIGH-SCHOOL-STUDENTS AND EXPERTS [J].
GROSSLIGHT, L ;
UNGER, C ;
JAY, E ;
SMITH, CL .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 1991, 28 (09) :799-822