Impact of geological complexity of the Fruitland Formation on combined CO2 enhanced recovery/sequestration at San Juan Basin pilot site

被引:9
|
作者
Weber, Matthew [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wilson, Thomas H. [1 ,2 ]
Akwari, Bill [4 ]
Wells, Arthur W. [2 ]
Koperna, George [5 ]
机构
[1] W Virginia Univ, Dept Geol & Geog, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[2] US DOE, Natl Energy Technol Lab, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Range Resources, Canonsburg, PA USA
[4] Conoco Phillips, Farmington, NM USA
[5] Adv Resources Int, Houston, TX USA
关键词
Carbon sequestration; Coalbed methane; 3D seismic; 3D reservoir model; Seismic interpretation; Unconventional reservoirs; NEW-MEXICO; PALEOCLIMATE CONTROLS; SEQUESTRATION; INJECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.coal.2012.09.011
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In this study we present well log and 3D seismic interpretations of a coalbed methane reservoir in the late Cretaceous Fruitland Formation in the area surrounding the Southwest Regional Partnership on carbon sequestration's San Juan Basin carbon sequestration pilot site in New Mexico, USA. The interpretation incorporated geophysical logs from 38 wells located in a 23 km(2) area surrounding the pilot site, which lies near the southern edge of the high rate Fruitland coal production fairway located along the axis of the San Juan Basin. Log interpretations revealed three coal-bearing zones (upper, middle and lower) within the Fruitland Formation that are approximately 7, 4.7 and 8.5 m (23, 15.5 and 28 ft) thick, respectively. The interpretations indicate that each of these coal zones is split by a parting into upper and lower beds making a total of six mappable coal beds in the area surrounding the CO2 injection well. The combined thickness of the upper two coal beds in the upper coal zone varies between 3.5 and 4.8 m (11.5 to 15.7 ft); and that of the middle beds, from 2 to 4.3 m (6.6 to 14.1 ft) thick. The thickness of the individual coal beds in the lower coal zone varies from about 2.7 to 4.25 m (9 to 14 ft) for the upper bed and from about 3 to 5.5 m (10 to 18 ft) for the basal coal bed. Partings separating the upper and lower coal beds in each zone are on average about 2 m (7 ft) in the upper and middle zones; and about 1 m (3.5 ft) in the lower zone. Seismic response of the upper, middle and lower coal zones was interpreted and correlated through the 23 km(2) area. The stratigraphic complexity of this coalbed methane reservoir is also accompanied by considerable structural disharmony between the three coal zones. The reservoir complexity revealed in this study may account for lower than expected CO2 injectivity and preferential injection into the lower coal zone during the pilot test. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 58
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CO2 Injection Performance in the Fruitland Coal Fairway, San Juan Basin: Results of a Field Pilot
    Oudinot, Anne Y.
    Koperna, George J., Jr.
    Philip, Zeno G.
    Liu, Ning
    Heath, Jason E.
    Wells, Arthur
    Young, Genevieve B.
    Wilson, Tom
    SPE JOURNAL, 2011, 16 (04): : 864 - 879
  • [2] CO2 sequestration in an unmineable coalbed -: San Juan Basin, Colorado, USA
    Erickson, D
    Jensen, JR
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2001, : 589 - 592
  • [3] Computational Study of Surface Signature of Anthropogenic CO2 at a Potential Carbon Sequestration Site, San Juan Basin
    Ogretim, Egemen Ol
    Gray, Donald D.
    Bromhal, Grant S.
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2014, 31 (05) : 225 - 231
  • [4] Fracture and 3D seismic interpretations of the Fruitland Formation and cover strata: Implications for CO2 retention and tracer movement, San Juan Basin Pilot test
    Wilson, Thomas H.
    Wells, Art
    Peters, Dwight
    Mioduchowski, Andrew
    Martinez, Gabriela
    Koperna, George
    Akwari, Bill N.
    Heath, Jason
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2012, 99 : 35 - 53
  • [5] Impact of CO2 geological sequestration on the nucleation of earthquakes
    Cappa, Frederic
    Rutqvist, Jonny
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 38
  • [6] Dual Benefits of Enhanced Oil Recovery and CO2 Sequestration: The Impact of CO2 Injection Approach on Oil Recovery
    Alam, Mir Muhammad Mansoor
    Hassan, Amjed
    Mahmoud, Mohamed
    Sibaweihi, Najmudeen
    Patil, Shirish
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 10
  • [7] Impact of formation slope and fault on CO2 storage efficiency and containment at the Shenhua CO2 geological storage site in the Ordos Basin, China
    Jing, Jing
    Tang, Zhonghua
    Yang, Yanlin
    Ma, Liangzhe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2019, 88 : 209 - 225
  • [8] Diffusion of carbon dioxide in formation water as a result of CO2 enhanced oil recovery and CO2 sequestration
    Zarghami S.
    Boukadi F.
    Al-Wahaibi Y.
    Al-Wahaibi, Yahya (ymn@squ.edu.om), 1600, Springer Verlag (07): : 161 - 168
  • [9] CO2 sequestration with enhanced shale gas recovery
    Liu, Danqing
    Li, Yilian
    Yang, Seng
    Agarwal, Ramesh K.
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2021, 43 (24) : 3227 - 3237
  • [10] Forecasting CO2 Sequestration with Enhanced Oil Recovery
    Ampomah, William
    McPherson, Brian
    Balch, Robert
    Grigg, Reid
    Cather, Martha
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (16)