In-tunnel closure of patent foramen ovale with a FlatStent EF™

被引:5
作者
Noc, Marko [1 ]
Suligoj, Natasa Cernic [2 ]
Zvan, Bojana [3 ]
Zorc, Metka [4 ]
Kar, Saibal [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Gen Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Izola, Slovenia
[3] Univ Med Ctr, Clin Dept Vasc Neurol & Intens Neurol Treatment, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[4] MC Medicor, Izola, Slovenia
[5] Cedars Sinai Heart Inst, Cardiovasc Intervent Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
patent foramen ovale; in-tunnel closure; TRANSCATHETER CLOSURE; PFO CLOSURE;
D O I
10.5603/KP.a2015.0026
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Devices for percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) are traditionally based on two opposing discs, leaving significant surface areas exposed in the left and right atrium. The FlatStent EF (TM) PFO Closure System (Coherex Inc., Salt Lake City, USA) represents a major departure from these devices because it is designed to focus primarily on the PFO tunnel, leaving minimal foreign material behind. Aim: To investigate the patient selection, effectiveness, and safety of in-tunnel closure with a FlatStent EF (TM) in patients with PFO of >= 4 mm tunnel length and < 12 mm diameter at preprocedural transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Results: Among 46 consecutive patients undergoing PFO closure, a FlatStent EF (TM) could be implanted and resulted in initial successful closure (< 5 bubbles during Valsalva manoeuvre) in 21 (46%) patients. TEE at 162 +/- 40 and 317 +/- 162 days after implantation demonstrated functional closure in 90% and 95% of cases, respectively. No device or air embolisation, pericardial effusion, or thrombus formation was documented. Small in-tunnel peri-device colour Doppler left to right flow was documented in 10% and 2-6 mm protrusion of FlatStent EF (TM) along right atrial septum without any residual flow/bubble shunting in 14%. Patients with suboptimal closure (> 5 bubbles during Valsalva manoeuvre and/or in-tunnel colour flow) had shorter tunnel on preprocedural TEE (5.3 +/- 1.5 vs. 10.8 +/- 3.5 mm; p = 0.003). There was no difference in TEE diameter (1.8 +/- 0.5 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.5 mm; p = 0.38) and stretched diameter by sizing balloon (6.3 +/- 2.5 vs. 6.3 +/- 1.0 mm; p = 1.00). Conclusions: In-tunnel PFO closure with a FlatStent EF (TM) represents an effective and safe option only in carefully selected patients with long tunnel (> 4 mm) regardless of the diameter if it is < 12 mm. These criteria are fulfilled in < 50% of consecutive candidates for PFO closure. The new phenomenon of in-tunnel peri-device flow and FlatStent EF (TM) protrusion along the right atrial septum were documented during systematic TEE follow up.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 556
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Bialkowski J, 2012, KARDIOL POL, V70, P1142
  • [2] Cernic Suligoj N, 2011, SLOV KARDIOL, V8, P15
  • [3] Percutaneous closure of the patent foramen ovale using the HELEX® Septal Occluder: acute and long-term results in 405 patients
    Heinisch, Corinna
    Bertog, Stefan
    Wunderlich, Nina
    Majunke, Nico
    Baranowski, Andreas
    Leetz, Michaela
    Fischer, Evelyne
    Staubach, Stefan
    Zimmermann, Wibke
    Hofmann, Ilona
    Sievert, Horst
    [J]. EUROINTERVENTION, 2012, 8 (06) : 717 - 723
  • [4] Transcatheter closure versus medical therapy of patent foramen ovale and presumed paradoxical thromboemboli - A systematic review
    Khairy, P
    O'Donnell, CP
    Landzberg, MJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 139 (09) : 753 - 760
  • [5] Three-dimensional imaging of the atrial septum and patent foramen ovale anatomy: defining the morphological phenotypes of patent foramen ovale
    Rana, Bushra S.
    Shapiro, Len M.
    McCarthy, Karen P.
    Ho, Siew Yen
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2010, 11 (10): : I19 - I25
  • [6] Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale with a novel FlatStent™
    Reiffenstein, Isabel
    Majunke, Nicolas
    Wunderlich, Nina
    Carter, Phillip
    Jones, Randall
    Sievert, Horst
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2008, 5 (04) : 419 - 425
  • [7] The Coherex FlatStent™: an advance in patent foramen ovale closure
    Ruygrok, Peter N.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2010, 7 (02) : 193 - 199
  • [8] Initial Clinical Experience with the Coherex FlatStent™ and FlatStent™ EF PFO Closure System for In-tunnel PFO Closure: Results of the Coherex-EU Study
    Sievert, Horst
    Wunderlich, Nina
    Reiffenstein, Isabel
    Ruygrok, Peter
    Grube, Eberhard
    Buellesfeld, Lutz
    Meier, Bernhard
    Schofer, Joachim
    Muller, David
    Jones, Randall K.
    Gillam, Linda
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 83 (07) : 1135 - 1143
  • [9] PFO closure with the Premere PFO closure device: acute results and follow-up of 263 patients
    Stanczak, Lukasz J.
    Bertog, Stefan C.
    Wunderlich, Nina
    Franke, Jennifer
    Sievert, Horst
    [J]. EUROINTERVENTION, 2012, 8 (03) : 345 - 351
  • [10] Long-term results after fluoroscopy-guided closure of patent foramen ovale for secondary prevention of paradoxical embolism
    Wahl, A.
    Kunz, M.
    Moschovitis, A.
    Nageh, T.
    Schwerzmann, M.
    Seiler, C.
    Mattle, H. P.
    Windecker, S.
    Meier, B.
    [J]. HEART, 2008, 94 (03) : 336 - 341