Symptoms in Response to Controlled Diesel Exhaust More Closely Reflect Exposure Perception Than True Exposure

被引:19
作者
Carlsten, Chris [1 ]
Oron, Assaf P. [2 ]
Curtiss, Heidi [3 ]
Jarvis, Sara [3 ]
Daniell, William [3 ,4 ]
Kaufman, Joel D. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Environm & Occupat Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Seattle Childrens Res Inst, Childrens Core Biomed Stat, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Environm & Occupat Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Seattle, WA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
THRESHOLD LEVELS; SENSITIVITY; HUMANS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0083573
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Diesel exhaust (DE) exposures are very common, yet exposure-related symptoms haven't been rigorously examined. Objective: Describe symptomatic responses to freshly generated and diluted DE and filtered air (FA) in a controlled human exposure setting; assess whether such responses are altered by perception of exposure. Methods: 43 subjects participated within three double-blind crossover experiments to order-randomized DE exposure levels (FA and DE calibrated at 100 and/or 200 micrograms/m(3) particulate matter of diameter less than 2.5 microns), and completed questionnaires regarding symptoms and dose perception. Results: For a given symptom cluster, the majority of those exposed to moderate concentrations of diesel exhaust do not report such symptoms. The most commonly reported symptom cluster was of the nose (29%). Blinding to exposure is generally effective. Perceived exposure, rather than true exposure, is the dominant modifier of symptom reporting. Conclusion: Controlled human exposure to moderate-dose diesel exhaust is associated with a range of mild symptoms, though the majority of individuals will not experience any given symptom. Blinding to DE exposure is generally effective. Perceived DE exposure, rather than true DE exposure, is the dominant modifier of symptom reporting.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Amer Thoracic Soc, 2000, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V161, P665
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Health Assessment Document for Diesel Engine Exhaust
[3]   Dose-response relationships and threshold levels in skin and respiratory allergy [J].
Arts, JHE ;
Mommers, C ;
de Heer, C .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2006, 36 (03) :219-251
[4]   The association of respiratory problems in a community sample with self-reported chemical intolerance [J].
Baldwin, CM ;
Bell, IR ;
ORourke, MK ;
Lebowitz, MD .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 13 (05) :547-552
[5]   Coagulation markers in healthy human subjects exposed to diesel exhaust [J].
Carlsten, Chris ;
Kaufman, Joel D. ;
Peretz, Alon ;
Trenga, Carol A. ;
Sheppard, Lianne ;
Sullivan, Jeffrey H. .
THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2007, 120 (06) :849-855
[6]   Occupational exposure to volatile organic compounds and aldehydes in the US trucking industry [J].
Davis, M. E. ;
Blicharz, A. P. ;
Hart, J. E. ;
Laden, F. ;
Garshick, E. ;
Smith, T. J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 41 (20) :7152-7158
[7]   Responses to controlled diesel vapor exposure among chemically sensitive Gulf War veterans [J].
Fiedler, N ;
Giardino, N ;
Natelson, B ;
Ottenweller, JE ;
Weisel, C ;
Lioy, P ;
Lehrer, P ;
Ohman-Strickland, P ;
Kelly-McNeil, K ;
Kipen, H .
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2004, 66 (04) :588-598
[8]   Stressors, personality traits, and coping of Gulf War veterans with chronic fatigue [J].
Fiedler, N ;
Lange, G ;
Tiersky, L ;
DeLuca, J ;
Policastro, T ;
Kelly-McNeil, K ;
McWilliams, R ;
Korn, L ;
Natelson, B .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2000, 48 (06) :525-535
[9]  
Gould T, 2008, INHAL TOXICOL, V20, P49, DOI [10.1080/08958370701758478, 10.1080/08958370701758478 ]
[10]   Formaldehyde and chemosensory irritation in humans: A controlled human exposure study [J].
Lang, Isabelle ;
Bruckner, Thomas ;
Triebig, Gerhard .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 50 (01) :23-36