COULD OZONE TREATMENT BE A PROMISING ALTERNATIVE FOR OSTEOMYELITIS? AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

被引:14
作者
Bilge, Ali [1 ]
Ozturk, Omur [2 ]
Adali, Yasemen [3 ]
Ustebay, Sefer [4 ]
机构
[1] Kafkas Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Kars, Turkey
[2] Kafkas Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesia & Reanimat, Kars, Turkey
[3] Kafkas Univ, Dept Pathol, Fac Med, Kars, Turkey
[4] Kafkas Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, Kars, Turkey
来源
ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA | 2018年 / 26卷 / 01期
关键词
Osteomyelitis/therapy; Ozone/adverse effects; Ozone/therapeutic use; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1590/1413-785220182601179926
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate the biochemical and histopathological impact of ozone treatment in an experimental model of osteomyelitis in rats. Methods: A total of 24 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (3 months old, each weighing 300 to 400 g) were randomly allocated into three groups. Group I (n=8) served as a control and received no interventions or medications. In Group II (n=8), osteomyelitis was induced in the femur and no treatment was applied. Group III (n=8) received intraperitoneal ozone treatment for 3 weeks after the formation of osteomyelitis in the femur. Serum samples were taken to assess total antioxidant capacity (TAC), protein carbonyl content (PCO), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Bone specimens obtained from the femur were histopathologically evaluated for inflammation, necrosis, osteomyelitis, and abscess formation. Results: Serum TAC levels were notably higher (p<0.001), while LDH levels were lower (p=0.002) in Group III than Group II. No significant difference was detected between groups with respect to PCO level. Similarly, Group III displayed more favorable histopathological outcomes with respect to osteomyelitis (p=0.008), inflammation (p=0.001), necrosis (p=0.022), and abscess formation (p=0.022). Conclusion: Ozone may be a useful adjunct treatment for osteomyelitis. Further studies in animals and humans are needed to clarify and confirm these preventive effects, understand the underlying pathophysiology, and establish guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 71
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Atashpour S, 2017, WORLD J HEPATOL, V9, P209, DOI 10.4254/wjh.v9.i4.209
[2]   McFarland nephelometer as a simple method to estimate the sensitivity of the polymerase chain reaction using Mycobacterium tuberculosis as a research tool [J].
Bollela, VR ;
Sato, DN ;
Fonseca, BAL .
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 32 (09) :1073-1076
[3]  
Chen Chin-En, 2004, Chang Gung Med J, V27, P91
[4]  
Das S., 2011, IJDA, V3, P538
[5]  
Dastan SA, 2015, CUMHUR SCI J, V36, P1365
[6]   Tezosentan Reduces the Renal Injury Induced by Abdominal Aortic Ischemia-Reperfusion in Rats [J].
Gulmen, Senol ;
Kiris, Ilker ;
Narin, Cuneyt ;
Ceylan, Berit Gokce ;
Mermi, Betul ;
Sutcu, Recep ;
Meteoglu, Ibrahim .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 157 (01) :E7-E13
[7]   Ghrelin against alendronate-induced gastric damage in rats [J].
Iseri, SÖ ;
Sener, G ;
Yüksel, M ;
Contuk, G ;
Çetinel, S ;
Gedik, N ;
Yegen, BC .
JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2005, 187 (03) :399-406
[8]  
Mader J T, 1989, Orthop Rev, V18, P581
[9]  
REZNICK AZ, 1994, METHOD ENZYMOL, V233, P357
[10]  
Seidler V, 2008, Prague Med Rep, V109, P5