The Negative Predictive Value of a PI-RADS Version 2 Score of 1 on Prostate MRI and the Factors Associated With a False-Negative MRI Study

被引:7
作者
Ma, Hong Y. [1 ]
Ahmed, Firas S. [1 ]
Luk, Lyndon [1 ]
Martina, Luis A. Pina [1 ]
Wenske, Sven [2 ]
Shaish, Hiram [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Urol, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
关键词
MRI; PI-RADS; prostate cancer; CANCER; LOCALIZATION; METAANALYSIS; ANTIGEN; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.20.22784
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to calculate the negative predictive value of a prostate MRI study with a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RA DSv2) score of 1 (hereafter referred to as a PI-RADS 1 MRI study) and to explore the patient characteristics and MRI-based factors associated with an MRI study with false-negative results. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 542 consecutive patients with a PI-RADS 1 MRI study obtained between January 2016 and July 2019 were retrospectively identified. Patient charts were examined to identify those patients who subsequently underwent systematic prostate biopsy within 1 year of undergoing MRI or at any later date if the biopsy was negative. Patient characteristics and MRI-specific factors were recorded. Two blinded radiologists evaluated the quality of the axial 12-weighted, DWI, and apparent diffusion coefficient sequences; measured the volume of the bladder, the prostate gland, and rectal gas; and determined whether the peripheral zone was avidly enhancing and whether low signal intensity was seen in 50% or more of the peripheral zone on T2-weighted images. Interobserver agreement was tested. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were built. RESULTS. A total of 150 patients (median age, 63 years; interquartile range, 56-70 years) were included. Of these patients, 19 (13%) had prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 3 + 4 or greater, yielding a negative predictive value of 87%. Both low T2 signal intensity in the peripheral zone and the prostate-specific antigen level were associated with a false-negative PI-RADS 1 assessment (odds ratio, 49 [95% CI, 1.6-14.9; p = 0.006] and 1.1 [95% CI, 1.0-1.2; p = 0.03], respectively). A cutoff prostate-specific antigen level of 3.97 ng/mL resulted in sensitivity and specificity of 89% and 21%, respectively. There was moderate interobserver agreement for low T2 signal intensity in the peripheral zone (kappa coefficient = 0.75). CONCLUSION. Even among select patients who undergo subsequent biopsy because of a high clinical suspicion of prostate cancer, a PI-RA DS 1 prostate MRI study has a high negative predictive value. A T2-hypointense peripheral zone and an elevated prostate-specific antigen level are significantly associated with a false-negative MRI study.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 672
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Association of prostate zonal volume with location and aggressiveness of clinically significant prostate cancer: A multiparametric MRI study according to PI-RADS version 2.1
    Yang, Ling
    Li, Mou
    Zhang, Meng-Ni
    Yao, Jin
    Song, Bin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 150
  • [32] Validation of the Barcelona-MRI predictive model when PI-RADS v2.1 is used with transperineal prostate biopsies
    Morote, Juan
    Paesano, Nahuel
    Picola, Natalia
    Munoz-Rodriguez, Jesus
    Munoz-Rivero, Marta, V
    Ruiz-Plazas, Xavier
    Celma, Ana
    Garcia-de Manuel, Gemma
    Miro, Berta
    Servian, Pol
    Abascal, Jose M.
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2024, 50 (05): : 595 - 604
  • [33] Long-term follow-up results of multiparametric prostate MRI and the prognostic value of PI-RADS: a single-center retrospective cohort study
    Onder, Omer
    Ayva, Mujdat
    Yarasir, Yasin
    Gurler, Volkan
    Yazici, Mustafa Sertac
    Akdogan, Bulent
    Karaosmanoglu, Ali Devrim
    Karcaaltincaba, Musturay
    Ozmen, Mustafa Nasuh
    Akata, Deniz
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 30 (03): : 139 - 151
  • [34] Can the addition of clinical information improve the accuracy of PI-RADS version 2 for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in positive MRI?
    Polanec, S. H.
    Bickel, H.
    Wengert, G. J.
    Arnoldner, M.
    Clauser, P.
    Susani, M.
    Shariat, S. F.
    Pinker, K.
    Helbich, T. H.
    Baltzer, P. A. T.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (02) : 157.e1 - 157.e7
  • [35] Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS Version 2.1 for Prostate Cancer Detection and Investigation of Multiparametric MRI-derived Markers
    Yilmaz, Enis C.
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Belue, Mason J.
    Harmon, Stephanie A.
    Phelps, Tim E.
    Garcia, Charisse
    Hazen, Lindsey A.
    Toubaji, Antoun
    Merino, Maria J.
    Gurram, Sandeep
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Turkbey, Baris
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 307 (04)
  • [36] Can a prostate biopsy be safely deferred on PI-RADS 1,2 or 3 lesions seen on pre-biopsy mp-MRI?
    Raheem, Rickaz Abdul
    Razzaq, Ahsen
    Beraud, Victoria
    Menzies-Wilson, Richard
    Odeh, Rakan
    Ibiok, Imoh
    Mulawkar, Prashant
    Andrews, Henry
    Anjum, Iqbal
    Hosny, Khaled
    Leslie, Tom
    ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 21 (01) : 10 - 17
  • [37] Prostate Cancer Detection with mpMRI According to PI-RADS v2 Compared with Systematic MRI/TRUS-Fusion Biopsy: A Prospective Study
    Sauck, Anja
    Keller, Isabelle
    Hainc, Nicolin
    Pfofe, Denis
    Najafi, Arash
    John, Hubert
    Hohmann, Joachim
    TOMOGRAPHY, 2022, 8 (04) : 2020 - 2029
  • [38] Deep learning model for the detection of prostate cancer and classification of clinically significant disease using multiparametric MRI in comparison to PI-RADs score
    Yang, Chunguang
    Li, Basen
    Luan, Yang
    Wang, Shiwei
    Bian, Yang
    Zhang, Junbiao
    Wang, Zefeng
    Liu, Bo
    Chen, Xin
    Hacker, Marcus
    Li, Zhen
    Li, Xiang
    Wang, Zhihua
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 42 (05) : 158.e17 - 158.e27
  • [39] EVALUATION OF PROSTATE IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM (PI-RADS) VERSION 2 FOR PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION: A RETROSPECTIVE SINGLE-CENTER STUDY
    Grbanovic, Lora
    Kovacevic, Lucija
    Kulis, Tomislav
    Kastelan, Zeljko
    Kralik, Marko
    Ivandic, Stjepan
    Prutki, Maja
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2024, 63 : 14 - 21
  • [40] Prebiopsy Multiparametric MRI With Cancer-Negative Findings in Men With Suspected Prostate Cancer: Evaluation Using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2
    Kim, Jun Gon
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Kim, Jae-Hun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 211 (01) : 121 - 126