The Negative Predictive Value of a PI-RADS Version 2 Score of 1 on Prostate MRI and the Factors Associated With a False-Negative MRI Study

被引:7
|
作者
Ma, Hong Y. [1 ]
Ahmed, Firas S. [1 ]
Luk, Lyndon [1 ]
Martina, Luis A. Pina [1 ]
Wenske, Sven [2 ]
Shaish, Hiram [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Urol, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
关键词
MRI; PI-RADS; prostate cancer; CANCER; LOCALIZATION; METAANALYSIS; ANTIGEN; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.20.22784
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to calculate the negative predictive value of a prostate MRI study with a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RA DSv2) score of 1 (hereafter referred to as a PI-RADS 1 MRI study) and to explore the patient characteristics and MRI-based factors associated with an MRI study with false-negative results. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 542 consecutive patients with a PI-RADS 1 MRI study obtained between January 2016 and July 2019 were retrospectively identified. Patient charts were examined to identify those patients who subsequently underwent systematic prostate biopsy within 1 year of undergoing MRI or at any later date if the biopsy was negative. Patient characteristics and MRI-specific factors were recorded. Two blinded radiologists evaluated the quality of the axial 12-weighted, DWI, and apparent diffusion coefficient sequences; measured the volume of the bladder, the prostate gland, and rectal gas; and determined whether the peripheral zone was avidly enhancing and whether low signal intensity was seen in 50% or more of the peripheral zone on T2-weighted images. Interobserver agreement was tested. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were built. RESULTS. A total of 150 patients (median age, 63 years; interquartile range, 56-70 years) were included. Of these patients, 19 (13%) had prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 3 + 4 or greater, yielding a negative predictive value of 87%. Both low T2 signal intensity in the peripheral zone and the prostate-specific antigen level were associated with a false-negative PI-RADS 1 assessment (odds ratio, 49 [95% CI, 1.6-14.9; p = 0.006] and 1.1 [95% CI, 1.0-1.2; p = 0.03], respectively). A cutoff prostate-specific antigen level of 3.97 ng/mL resulted in sensitivity and specificity of 89% and 21%, respectively. There was moderate interobserver agreement for low T2 signal intensity in the peripheral zone (kappa coefficient = 0.75). CONCLUSION. Even among select patients who undergo subsequent biopsy because of a high clinical suspicion of prostate cancer, a PI-RA DS 1 prostate MRI study has a high negative predictive value. A T2-hypointense peripheral zone and an elevated prostate-specific antigen level are significantly associated with a false-negative MRI study.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 672
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PI-RADS Version 2: Detection of Clinically Significant Cancer in Patients With Biopsy Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer
    Seo, Ji Won
    Shin, Su-Jin
    Oh, Young Taik
    Jung, Dae Chul
    Cho, Nam Hoon
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Park, Sung Yoon
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (01) : W1 - W9
  • [22] Optimal PSA density threshold and predictive factors for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in patient with a PI-RADS 3 lesion on MRI
    Nguyen, Truong-An
    Fourcade, Alexandre
    Zambon, Audrey
    Saout, Kevin
    Deruelle, Charles
    Joulin, Vincent
    Tissot, Valentin
    Doucet, Laurent
    Rozet, Francois
    Fournier, Georges
    Valeri, Antoine
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2023, 41 (08) : 354e11 - 354e18
  • [23] Update on PI-RADS Version 2.1 Diagnostic Performance Benchmarks for Prostate MRI: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Oerther, Benedict
    Nedelcu, Andrea
    Engel, Hannes
    Schmucker, Christine
    Schwarzer, Guido
    Brugger, Timo
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Eisenblaetter, Michel
    Sigle, August
    Gratzke, Christian
    Bamberg, Fabian
    Benndorf, Matthias
    RADIOLOGY, 2024, 312 (02)
  • [24] The diagnostic value of PI-RADS V1 and V2 using multiparametric MRI in transition zone prostate clinical cancer
    Wang, Ximing
    Bao, Jie
    Ping, Xiaoxia
    Hu, Chunhong
    Hou, Jianquan
    Dong, Fenglin
    Guo, Lingchuan
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 16 (03) : 3201 - 3206
  • [25] Prediction of false-positive PI-RADS 5 lesions on prostate multiparametric MRI: development and internal validation of a clinical-radiological characteristics based nomogram
    Cheng, Yongbing
    Fan, Bo
    Fu, Yao
    Yin, Haoli
    Lu, Jiaming
    Li, Danyan
    Li, Xiaogong
    Qiu, Xuefeng
    Guo, Hongqian
    BMC UROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [26] Prebiopsy biparametric MRI: differences of PI-RADS version 2 in patients with different PSA levels
    Choi, M. H.
    Lee, Y. J.
    Jung, S. E.
    Rha, S. E.
    Byun, J. Y.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 73 (09) : 810 - 817
  • [27] Risks of grade reclassification among patients with Gleason grade group 1 prostate cancer and PI-RADS 5 findings on prostate MRI
    Sundaresan, Vinaik Mootha
    Webb, Lindsey
    Rabil, Maximilian
    Golos, Aleksandra
    Sutherland, Ryan
    Bailey, Jonell
    Rajwa, Pawel
    Seibert, Tyler M.
    Loeb, Stacy
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Catalona, William J.
    Sprenkle, Preston C.
    Kim, Isaac Y.
    Leapman, Michael S.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2025, 43 (03) : 193e19 - 193e26
  • [28] Influence of the Location and Zone of Tumor in Prostate Cancer Detection and Localization on 3-T Multiparametric MRI Based on PI-RADS Version 2
    Wibulpolprasert, Pornphan
    Raman, Steven S.
    Hsu, William
    Margolis, Daniel J. A.
    Asvadi, Nazanin H.
    Khoshnoodi, Pooria
    Moshksar, Amin
    Tan, Nelly
    Ahuja, Preeti
    Maehara, Cleo K.
    Sisk, Anthony
    Sayre, James
    Lu, David S. K.
    Reiter, Robert E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 214 (05) : 1101 - 1111
  • [29] Cognitive MRI-TRUS fusion-targeted prostate biopsy according to PI-RADS classification in patients with prior negative systematic biopsy results
    Lai, Wei-Jen
    Wang, Hsin-Kai
    Liu, Hsian-Tzu
    Park, Byung Kwan
    Shen, Shu-Huei
    Lin, Tzu-Ping
    Chung, Hsiao-Jen
    Huang, Yi-Hsiu
    Chang, Yen-Hwa
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 79 (11) : 618 - 624
  • [30] The combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2) and periprostatic fat thickness on multi-parametric MRI to predict the presence of prostate cancer
    Cao, Yudong
    Cao, Min
    Chen, Yuke
    Yu, Wei
    Fan, Yu
    Liu, Qing
    Gao, Ge
    Zhao, Zheng
    Wang, Xiaoying
    Jin, Jie
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (27) : 44040 - 44049