The Negative Predictive Value of a PI-RADS Version 2 Score of 1 on Prostate MRI and the Factors Associated With a False-Negative MRI Study

被引:7
|
作者
Ma, Hong Y. [1 ]
Ahmed, Firas S. [1 ]
Luk, Lyndon [1 ]
Martina, Luis A. Pina [1 ]
Wenske, Sven [2 ]
Shaish, Hiram [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Urol, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
关键词
MRI; PI-RADS; prostate cancer; CANCER; LOCALIZATION; METAANALYSIS; ANTIGEN; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.20.22784
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to calculate the negative predictive value of a prostate MRI study with a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RA DSv2) score of 1 (hereafter referred to as a PI-RADS 1 MRI study) and to explore the patient characteristics and MRI-based factors associated with an MRI study with false-negative results. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 542 consecutive patients with a PI-RADS 1 MRI study obtained between January 2016 and July 2019 were retrospectively identified. Patient charts were examined to identify those patients who subsequently underwent systematic prostate biopsy within 1 year of undergoing MRI or at any later date if the biopsy was negative. Patient characteristics and MRI-specific factors were recorded. Two blinded radiologists evaluated the quality of the axial 12-weighted, DWI, and apparent diffusion coefficient sequences; measured the volume of the bladder, the prostate gland, and rectal gas; and determined whether the peripheral zone was avidly enhancing and whether low signal intensity was seen in 50% or more of the peripheral zone on T2-weighted images. Interobserver agreement was tested. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were built. RESULTS. A total of 150 patients (median age, 63 years; interquartile range, 56-70 years) were included. Of these patients, 19 (13%) had prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 3 + 4 or greater, yielding a negative predictive value of 87%. Both low T2 signal intensity in the peripheral zone and the prostate-specific antigen level were associated with a false-negative PI-RADS 1 assessment (odds ratio, 49 [95% CI, 1.6-14.9; p = 0.006] and 1.1 [95% CI, 1.0-1.2; p = 0.03], respectively). A cutoff prostate-specific antigen level of 3.97 ng/mL resulted in sensitivity and specificity of 89% and 21%, respectively. There was moderate interobserver agreement for low T2 signal intensity in the peripheral zone (kappa coefficient = 0.75). CONCLUSION. Even among select patients who undergo subsequent biopsy because of a high clinical suspicion of prostate cancer, a PI-RA DS 1 prostate MRI study has a high negative predictive value. A T2-hypointense peripheral zone and an elevated prostate-specific antigen level are significantly associated with a false-negative MRI study.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 672
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of enema prep on the false-negative rate of a PI-RADS 1 MRI of the prostate for clinically significant prostate cancer
    H. Patel
    F. Ahmed
    L. Luk
    B. Navot
    H. Shaish
    Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47 : 2494 - 2499
  • [2] Impact of enema prep on the false-negative rate of a PI-RADS 1 MRI of the prostate for clinically significant prostate cancer
    Patel, H.
    Ahmed, F.
    Luk, L.
    Navot, B.
    Shaish, H.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (07) : 2494 - 2499
  • [3] Value of an online PI-RADS v2.1 score calculator for assessment of prostate MRI
    Barth, Borna K.
    Martini, Katharina
    Skawran, Stephan M.
    Schmid, Florian A.
    Rupp, Niels J.
    Zuber, Laura
    Donati, Olivio F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY OPEN, 2021, 8
  • [4] PI-RADS version 2.1: one small step for prostate MRI
    Barrett, T.
    Rajesh, A.
    Rosenkrantz, A. B.
    Choyke, P. L.
    Turkbey, B.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (11) : 841 - 852
  • [5] Prebiopsy Biparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2: A Multicenter Study
    Choi, Moon Hyung
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Lee, Young Joon
    Jung, Seung Eun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 212 (04) : 839 - 846
  • [6] Prostate MRI based on PI-RADS version 2: how we review and report
    Steiger, Philipp
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    CANCER IMAGING, 2016, 16
  • [7] Prostate MRI: practical guidelines for interpreting and reporting according to PI-RADS version 2.1
    Sanchez-Oro, R.
    Nuez, J. Torres
    Martinez-Sanz, G.
    Ortega, Q. Grau
    Bleila, M.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2020, 62 (06): : 437 - 451
  • [8] Implications of PI-RADS Version 1 and Updated Version 2 on the Scoring of Prostatic Lesions in Multiparametric MRI
    Haas, M.
    Guenzel, K.
    Penzkofer, T.
    Maxeiner, A.
    Fischer, T.
    Miller, K.
    Hamm, B.
    Asbach, P.
    Cash, H.
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2016, 47 (05) : 383 - 387
  • [9] Predictive value of PI-RADS classification in MRI-directed transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
    NiMhurchu, E.
    O'Kelly, F.
    Murphy, I. G.
    Lavelle, L. P.
    Collins, C. D.
    Lennon, G.
    Galvin, D.
    Mulvin, D.
    Quinlan, D.
    McMahon, C. J.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 71 (04) : 375 - 380
  • [10] Correlation between Intraprostatic PSMA Uptake and MRI PI-RADS of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in Patients with Prostate Cancer: Comparison of PI-RADS Version 2.0 and PI-RADS Version 2.1
    Zhao, Jing
    Mangarova, Dilyana B.
    Brangsch, Julia
    Kader, Avan
    Hamm, Bernd
    Brenner, Winfried
    Makowski, Marcus R.
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (12) : 1 - 13