Bone stress when miniplates are used for orthodontic anchorage: Finite element analysis

被引:10
作者
Huang, Yen-Wen
Chang, Chih-Han [3 ]
Wong, Tung-Yiu [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Jia-Kuang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Dept Stomatol, Coll Med, Tainan 704, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Coll Med, Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Inst Oral Med, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
[3] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Inst Biomed Engn, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
关键词
MOLAR INTRUSION; SYSTEM; IMPLANTS; PLATE; STABILITY; DEVICES; DOGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.04.019
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: The success rate of miniplates is superior to that of other temporary anchorage devices; nevertheless, the biomechanical behavior of miniplates during orthodontic use is not totally understood. The aim of this study was to investigate bone stress by finite element analysis when miniplates are used for orthodontic anchorage. Methods: A 3-dimensional model consisting of a bone block integrated with a miniplate and fixation screw system was constructed to simulate various types of miniplates, screw numbers, screw lengths, cortex thicknesses, and force magnitudes and directions. Results: The peak von Mises cortex stress values were highest with the I-type plates followed by the L-type, Y-type, and T-type plates. Bone stress decreased as the screw numbers increased but was not related to screw length. Bone stress increased as the cortex thickness decreased. Bone stress was linearly proportional to the force magnitude, and the highest values were produced when the force was in the forward direction. Conclusions: When a T- or Y-type plate is used, or when the force direction is in the tensile mode, bone stress decreases. Bone stress also decreases as the screw numbers increase and as the cortex thickness increases. Furthermore, it decreases as the force magnitude becomes less. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:466-72)
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 472
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Finite element analysis of non-axial versus axial loading of oral implants in the mandible of the dog [J].
Barbier, L ;
Vander Sloten, J ;
Krzesinski, G ;
Schepers, E ;
Van Der Perre, G .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1998, 25 (11) :847-858
[2]   A clinical evaluation of titanium miniplates as anchors for orthodontic treatment [J].
Choi, BH ;
Zhu, SJ ;
Kim, YH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2005, 128 (03) :382-384
[3]   Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices for Orthodontics [J].
Costello, Bernard J. ;
Ruiz, Ramon L. ;
Petrone, Joseph ;
Sohn, Jacqueline .
ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 22 (01) :91-+
[4]  
Creekmore T D, 1983, J Clin Orthod, V17, P266
[5]  
Daimaruya T, 2003, ANGLE ORTHOD, V73, P158
[6]  
Daimaruya T, 2001, ANGLE ORTHOD, V71, P60
[7]  
De Clerck Hugo, 2002, J Clin Orthod, V36, P455
[8]   Success of Zygomatic Plate-Screw Anchorage System [J].
Eroglu, Tamer ;
Kaya, Burcak ;
Cetinsahin, Alev ;
Arman, Ayca ;
Uckan, Sina .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 68 (03) :602-605
[9]   Numerical/experimental analysis of the stress field around miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage [J].
Gracco, A. ;
Cirignaco, A. ;
Cozzani, M. ;
Boccaccio, A. ;
Pappalettere, C. ;
Vitale, G. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2009, 31 (01) :12-20
[10]   Orthodontic anchorage system using a locking plate and self-drilling screws [J].
Hibi, H ;
Ueda, M ;
Sakai, M ;
Ikemori, Y .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 64 (07) :1173-1175