FUSION OF TERRASAR-X AND RAPIDEYE DATA: A QUALITY ANALYSIS

被引:8
作者
Sanli, F. Balik [1 ]
Abdikan, S. [2 ]
Esetlili, M. T. [3 ]
Ustuner, M. [1 ]
Sunar, F. [4 ]
机构
[1] Yildiz Tekn Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Dept Geomat Engn, TR-34220 Esenler, Turkey
[2] BeeSense Consultancy & Engn Geoinformat Technol, NL-2628 VG Delft, Netherlands
[3] Ege Univ, Fac Agr, Deparment Soil Sci & Plant Nutr, TR-35100 Bornova, Turkey
[4] Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Dept Geomat Engn, TR-34469 Maslak, Turkey
来源
ISPRS2013-SSG | 2013年 / 40-7-W2卷
关键词
Image fusion; TerraSAR-X; RapidEye; Multi-sensor; ALGORITHMS; IMAGES; SAR;
D O I
10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-7-W2-27-2013
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This research compares and evaluates image fusion algorithms to achieve spatially improved images while preserving the spectral information. In order to compare the performance of fusion techniques both active and passive images were used. As an active image a high resolution, X-band, VV polarized TerraSAR-X data and as a multispectral image RapidEye data were used. RapidEye provides five optical bands in the 400-850 nm range and it is the first space-borne sensor which operationally gathers the red edge spectrum (690-730 nm) besides the standard channels of multi-spectral satellite sensors. The selected study area is in the low lands of Menemen (Izmir) Plain on the west of Gediz Basin covering both agricultural fields and residential areas. For the quality analysis, Adjustable SAR-MS Fusion (ASMF), Ehlers fusion and High Pass Filtering (HPF) approaches were investigated. In this study preliminary results of selected image fusion methods were given. The quality of the fused images was assessed with qualitative and quantitative analyses. For the qualitative analysis visual comparison was applied using different band combinations of fused image and original multispectral Rapid-Eye image. In the merged images color distortions regarding to SAR-optical synergy were investigated. Statistical analysis was carried out as quantitative analyses. In this respect Correlation Coefficient (CC), Standard Deviation Difference (SDD), Universal Image Quality Index (UIQI) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) were performed for quality assessments. In general HPF was performed best while ASMF was performed the worst in all results.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 30
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
ABDIKAN S, 2008, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMME, V37, P1197
[2]   A comparative data-fusion analysis of multi-sensor satellite images [J].
Abdikan, Saygin ;
Sanli, Fusun Balik ;
Sunar, Filiz ;
Ehlers, Manfred .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIGITAL EARTH, 2014, 7 (08) :671-687
[3]   COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT FUSION ALGORITHMS IN URBAN AND AGRICULTURAL AREAS USING SAR (PALSAR AND RADARSAT) AND OPTICAL (SPOT) IMAGES [J].
Abdikan, Saygin ;
Sanli, Fusun Balik .
BOLETIM DE CIENCIAS GEODESICAS, 2012, 18 (04) :509-531
[4]  
Berger C., 2010, JOINT SIG WORKSH URB, P245
[5]   Multi-sensor image fusion for pansharpening in remote sensing [J].
Ehlers, Manfred ;
Klonus, Sascha ;
Astrand, Par Johan ;
Rosso, Pablo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMAGE AND DATA FUSION, 2010, 1 (01) :25-45
[6]  
Gungor O., 2012, J GEODESY GEOINFORMA, V1, P27
[7]   A Wavelet and IHS Integration Method to Fuse High Resolution SAR with Moderate Resolution Multispectral Images [J].
Hong, Gang ;
Zhang, Yun ;
Mercer, Bryan .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2009, 75 (10) :1213-1223
[8]   Comparison of different pan-sharpening methods for spectral characteristic preservation: multi-temporal CARTOSAT-1 and IRS-P6 LISS-IV imagery [J].
Jalan, Seema ;
Sokhi, Baldeo Singh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 33 (18) :5629-5643
[9]  
Klous S., 2008, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMME, V37, P189
[10]   A Comparison of Multisensor Integration Methods for Land Cover Classification in the Brazilian Amazon [J].
Lu, Dengsheng ;
Li, Guiying ;
Moran, Emilio ;
Dutra, Luciano ;
Batistella, Mateus .
GISCIENCE & REMOTE SENSING, 2011, 48 (03) :345-370