Towards sustainable development in China: do political rights and civil liberties matter for environmental quality?

被引:23
作者
Kocak, Emrah [1 ]
Kizilkaya, Oktay [2 ]
机构
[1] Erciyes Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Econ, TR-38039 Kayseri, Turkey
[2] Kirsehir Ahi Evran Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Econ, TR-40100 Kirsehir, Turkey
关键词
Sustainability; Political rights; Civil liberties; Carbon dioxide (CO2); Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC); China; CO2; EMISSIONS; KUZNETS CURVE; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; TIME-SERIES; DEMOCRACY; COINTEGRATION; IMPACT; POLLUTION; INSTITUTIONS; COUNTRIES;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-020-09813-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China is a rising power of the twenty-first century with its brilliant economic performance as a result of the transition to the free market economy model. However, China's economic development process has caused high environmental costs. For the past decade, China has been the leading country responsible for global carbon dioxide emissions (CO2). Therefore, determining the dynamics that have a reducing effect on CO(2)emissions in China is very important for the development of sustainable environmental policies. This paper aims to examine the impacts of the institutional structure on environmental sustainability in China. To this end, the study follows the method of cointegration with multiple breaks that produce robust econometric results and consider structural changes. According to the results, (i) the validity of an N-shaped EKC relationship is supported between economic growth and environmental pollution. (ii) Industrialization and trade have an increasing impact on environmental pollution. (iii) Political rights and civil liberties have a reducing effect on environmental pollution. Consequently, this study implies that political rights and civil liberties can make an important contribution to achieving sustainability goals in China.
引用
收藏
页码:35488 / 35500
页数:13
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]   Impact of economic, financial, and institutional factors on CO2 emissions: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa economies [J].
Abid, Mehdi .
UTILITIES POLICY, 2016, 41 :85-94
[2]   Democracy Does Cause Growth [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Naidu, Suresh ;
Restrepo, Pascual ;
Robinson, James A. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2019, 127 (01) :47-100
[3]   Reducing carbon emissions: The role of renewable energy and democracy [J].
Adams, Samuel ;
Acheampong, Alex O. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 240
[4]   Financial development and environmental degradation: Does political regime matter? [J].
Adams, Samuel ;
Klobodu, Edem Kwame Mensah .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 197 :1472-1479
[5]   Urbanization, democracy, bureaucratic quality, and environmental degradation [J].
Adams, Samuel ;
Klobodu, Edem Kwame Mensah .
JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 2017, 39 (06) :1035-1051
[6]   Does democracy affect environmental quality in developing countries? [J].
Arvin, B. Mak ;
Lew, Byron .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2011, 43 (09) :1151-1160
[7]   Relationship between climate change and low-carbon agricultural production: A case study in Hebei Province, China [J].
Bai, Yuping ;
Deng, Xiangzheng ;
Jiang, Sijian ;
Zhao, Zhe ;
Miao, Yi .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 105 :438-447
[8]   Public budgets for energy RD&D and the effects on energy intensity and pollution levels [J].
Balsalobre, Daniel ;
Alvarez, Agustin ;
Maria Cantos, Jose .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2015, 22 (07) :4881-4892
[9]   Effects of political institutions on air quality [J].
Bernauer, Thomas ;
Koubi, Vally .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (05) :1355-1365
[10]   Institutions and the environmental Kuznets Curve for deforestation: A crosscountry analysis for Latin America, Africa and Asia [J].
Bhattarai, M ;
Hammig, M .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (06) :995-1010