Divergence in behavioural responses to stress in two strains of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) with contrasting stress responsiveness

被引:95
作者
Schjolden, J
Backström, T
Pulman, KGT
Pottinger, TG
Winberg, S
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Comparat Physiol, Evolut Biol Ctr, Inst Physiol & Dev Biol, S-75236 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] NERC, Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster LA1 4AP, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
salmonids; behaviour; stress responsiveness; cortisol; coping style; novel object; social interaction; locomotor activity; aggression;
D O I
10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.04.008
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to establish whether two lines of rainbow trout divergent for their plasma cortisol response to a standardized stressor would show consistent differences in their behavioural response to a range of challenging situations. Our results show that the high-and low-responding (HR and LR) lines of rainbow trout did not differ in the aggression shown towards an intruder or in their response to the introduction of a novel object to their home environment. However, there was a difference in behaviour between the two selection lines when they were exposed to two unfamiliar environments. These results suggest that the behaviour of the HR and LR fish differs when they are challenged in unfamiliar environments, while their behaviour does not differ when they are challenged in their home environment. These observations are in agreement with studies on mammals that show that individuals with reactive coping styles perform similarly to proactive animals when they are challenged in a familiar environment, while they show different behaviour when they are challenged in unfamiliar environments. Thus, these results provide further evidence that the HR and LR selection lines of rainbow trout exemplify the two different coping styles described in mammals. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 544
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   BEHAVIORAL STRATEGIES OF AGGRESSIVE AND NONAGGRESSIVE MALE-MICE IN ACTIVE SHOCK AVOIDANCE [J].
BENUS, RF ;
BOHUS, B ;
KOOLHAAS, JM ;
VANOORTMERSSEN, GA .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 1989, 20 (1-3) :1-12
[2]   HERITABLE VARIATION FOR AGGRESSION AS A REFLECTION OF INDIVIDUAL COPING STRATEGIES [J].
BENUS, RF ;
BOHUS, B ;
KOOLHAAS, JM ;
VANOORTMERSSEN, GA .
EXPERIENTIA, 1991, 47 (10) :1008-1019
[3]  
Berton O, 1998, NEUROSCIENCE, V82, P147
[4]  
Bohus B, 1987, PROG BRAIN RES <D>, V72, P57
[5]   Individual variation in risk taking:: the effect of a predatory threat on fighting behavior in Nannacara anomala [J].
Brick, O ;
Jakobsson, S .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2002, 13 (04) :439-442
[6]   Stress-induced changes in brain serotonergic activity, plasma cortisol and aggressive behavior in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) is counteracted by L-DOPA [J].
Höglund, E ;
Kolm, N ;
Winberg, S .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2001, 74 (03) :381-389
[7]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERSPECIFIC AND INTRASPECIFIC AGGRESSION [J].
HUNTINGFORD, FA .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1976, 24 (AUG) :485-497
[8]   DO INTERSPECIFIC AND INTRASPECIFIC AGGRESSION VARY IN RELATION TO PREDATION PRESSURE IN STICKLEBACKS [J].
HUNTINGFORD, FA .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1982, 30 (AUG) :909-916
[9]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ANTI-PREDATOR BEHAVIOR AND AGGRESSION AMONG CONSPECIFICS IN 3-SPINED STICKLEBACK, GASTEROSTEUS-ACULEATUS [J].
HUNTINGFORD, FA .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1976, 24 (MAY) :245-260
[10]  
Koolhaas J, 2001, COPING CHALLENGE