Counter-Current Metal Leaching and Precipitation for Soil Remediation

被引:10
作者
Bisone, Sara [1 ]
Blais, Jean-Francois [1 ]
Mercier, Guy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Quebec, Inst Natl Rech Sci, Ctr Eau Terre & Environm, Quebec City, PQ G1K 9A9, Canada
来源
SOIL & SEDIMENT CONTAMINATION | 2013年 / 22卷 / 08期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Chemical leaching; contaminated soil; counter-current leaching; metal removal; precipitation; LEAD-CONTAMINATED SOILS; HEAVY-METALS; CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION; SELECTIVE RECOVERY; CHELATING-AGENTS; POLLUTED SOILS; CITRIC-ACID; WASTE-WATER; REMOVAL; LEACHATE;
D O I
10.1080/15320383.2013.770445
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Chemical acid leaching is an effective technique for extracting toxic metals from the finest fractions of polluted soils. Nevertheless, the use of large quantities of reagents and process water results in prohibitive operating costs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical and economic advantages of recirculating water in a counter-current leaching process (CCLP). Five 1-h sulfuric acid extraction steps (at pH = 1.5) followed by three 5-min water-washing steps were applied to the fine particle fraction (<0.125mm) of an industrial soil polluted by Cd (13.2mg center dot kg(-1)), Cu (3 100mg center dot kg(-1)), Mn (685mg kg(-1)), Pb (550mg center dot kg(-1)), and Zn (2840mg center dot kg(-1)). The leaching experiments were carried out at ambient temperature using a 10% soil suspension and in 1-L working volume stirred tank reactors. This paper presents results of conventional and counter-current leaching process (CCLP) tests and shows that the CCLP yields removal results for Cu (85%), Zn (86%), Mn (75%), and Cd (90%) that are similar to those obtained using the conventional leaching process. Moreover, the CCLP uses half of the quantity of acid and one-eighth of the amount of water that the conventional process uses. Metal precipitation with NaOH and Ca(OH)(2) was applied to treat the acidic leachates, and good metal removal yields were achieved with both reagents. However, the large consumption of chemicals implies high operating costs. In addition, the precipitation causes considerable sludge production, particularly when using Ca(OH)(2). Overall, the CCLP coupled to metal precipitation using NaOH and water recycling appears to be the most attractive option for the removal of toxic metals from this industrial soil.
引用
收藏
页码:856 / 875
页数:20
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Heavy metal contaminants removal by soil washing
    Abumaizar, RJ
    Smith, EH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1999, 70 (1-2) : 71 - 86
  • [2] Adriano D.C., 2001, TRACE ELEMENTS TERRE, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-21510-5
  • [3] Microbial and plant derived biomass for removal of heavy metals from wastewater
    Ahluwalia, Sarabjeet Singh
    Goyal, Dinesh
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 98 (12) : 2243 - 2257
  • [4] Allen H.E., 2002, BIOAVAILABILITY META
  • [5] Alloway J., 1995, HEAVY METALS SOILS, V2nd
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2001, Trace Elements in Soil and Plants, DOI 10.1201/b10158
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2003, J CTR JUL
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1999, Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Waste Water
  • [9] [Anonymous], 1997, REMEDIATION METALS C
  • [10] Remediation of heavy metal contaminated soil washing residues with amino polycarboxylic acids
    Arwidsson, Zandra
    Elgh-Dalgren, Kristin
    von Kronhelm, Thomas
    Sjoberg, Ragnar
    Allard, Bert
    van Hees, Patrick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2010, 173 (1-3) : 697 - 704