Comparison of laparoscopic and open colonic resection within fast-track and traditional perioperative care pathways: clinical outcomes and in-hospital costs

被引:10
作者
Ehrlich, A. [1 ]
Kellokumpu, S. [2 ]
Wagner, B. [3 ]
Kautiainen, H. [4 ,5 ]
Kellokumpu, I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Hosp Cent Finland, Dept Surg, Jyvaskyla 40620, Finland
[2] Univ Jyvaskyla, Sch Business & Econ, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[3] Cent Hosp Cent Finland, Dept Anesthesiol, Jyvaskyla 40620, Finland
[4] Turku Univ Hosp, Primary Hlth Care Unit, Dept Gen Practice, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland
[5] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Unit Primary Hlth Care, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Laparoscopy; colon; fast-track; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; MULTIMODAL OPTIMIZATION; SURGICAL CARE; OPEN SURGERY; RECOVERY; CANCER; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1177/1457496914557016
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study examined short-term clinical outcomes and in-hospital costs of laparoscopic and open colonic resection within fast-track and traditional care pathways. Material and Methods: A case-control study was performed. From 2007 to 2009, 116 patients underwent laparoscopic or open colonic resection for benign or malignant disease within fast-track care pathway. The control group consisted of 116 age-, sex-, comorbidity-, type of surgery-, and diagnosis-matched patients who received a traditional perioperative care from 2000 to 2007. The main measures of outcome were postoperative hospital stay and in-hospital costs, with 30-day mortality, morbidity, reoperation, and readmission rates as secondary outcomes. Results: The study groups were well balanced for baseline characteristics. Postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the fast-track than in the control group: laparoscopic resection median 3 versus 5days (p<0.001) and open resection 4 versus 7days (p<0.001). In multivariate analysis fast-track care, laparoscopic surgery and complications were independent determinants affecting the length of hospital stay. Overall, there was a trend toward lower in-hospital costs in the fast-track group compared with the traditional care group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Open surgery within fast-track care was the least costly option compared to laparoscopic or open surgery within traditional care but not significantly so when compared with laparoscopy within fast-track care. Intake of solid food and bowel function recovered 1day earlier in the fast-track group than in the control group (p<0.001). Complications were more frequent after open surgery than after laparoscopic surgery (23.3% vs 11.0%, p=0.012). Reoperation and readmission rates were similar between the study groups. Conclusion: Laparoscopy improves the efficiency of fast-track perioperative care without significantly increasing in-hospital costs.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 218
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Readmission rates after a planned hospital stay of 2 versus 3 days in fast-track colonic surgery [J].
Andersen, J. ;
Hjort-Jakobsen, D. ;
Christiansen, P. S. ;
Kehlet, H. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 94 (07) :890-893
[2]   Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization and standard perioperative surgical care [J].
Anderson, ADG ;
McNaught, CE ;
MacFie, J ;
Tring, I ;
Barker, P ;
Mitchell, CJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (12) :1497-1504
[3]   Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection - A randomized, blinded study [J].
Basse, L ;
Jakobsen, DH ;
Bardram, L ;
Billesbolle, P ;
Lund, C ;
Mogensen, T ;
Rosenberg, J ;
Kehlet, H .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2005, 241 (03) :416-423
[4]  
Bonjer HJ, 2007, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V142, P298
[5]   Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection [J].
Delaney, CP ;
Zutshi, M ;
Senagore, AJ ;
Remzi, FH ;
Hammel, J ;
Fazio, VW .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2003, 46 (07) :851-859
[6]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[7]   Systematic review of the costs of laparoscopic colorectal surgery [J].
Dowson, Henry M. ;
Huang, Andy ;
Soon, Yuen ;
Gage, Heather ;
Lovell, David P. ;
Rockall, Timothy A. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (06) :908-919
[8]   Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization of surgical care in patients undergoing major colonic resection [J].
Gatt, M ;
Anderson, ADG ;
Reddy, BS ;
Hayward-Sampson, P ;
Tring, IC ;
MacFie, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 (11) :1354-1362
[9]   Short-Term Outcomes of the Australasian Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Laparoscopic and Conventional Open Surgical Treatments for Colon Cancer The ALCCaS Trial [J].
Hewett, Peter J. ;
Allardyce, Randall A. ;
Bagshaw, Philip F. ;
Frampton, Christopher M. ;
Frizelle, Francis A. ;
Rieger, Nicholas A. ;
Smith, J. Shona ;
Solomon, Michael J. ;
Stephens, Jacqueline H. ;
Stevenson, Andrew R. L. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 248 (05) :728-738
[10]   Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery [J].
Kehlet, Henrik ;
Wilmore, Douglas W. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 248 (02) :189-198