Agricultural drought prediction using climate indices based on Support Vector Regression in Xiangjiang River basin

被引:118
作者
Tian, Ye [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Yue-Ping [3 ]
Wang, Guoqing [4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Coll Hydrometeorol, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Minist Educ, Key Lab Meteorol Disaster, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Inst Hydrol & Water Resources, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Hydraul Res Inst, State Key Lab Hydrol Water Resources & Hydraul En, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Western Pacific subtropical high; ENSO; SVR; Soil moisture; Xiangjiang River; CHINA; IMPACT; SPEI;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.025
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Drought can have a substantial impact on the ecosystem and agriculture of the affected region and does harm to local economy. This study aims to analyze the relation between soil moisture and drought and predict agricultural drought in Xiangjiang River basin. The agriculture droughts are presented with the Precipitation-Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI). The Support Vector Regression (SVR) model incorporating climate indices is developed to predict the agricultural droughts. Analysis of climate forcing including El Nino Southern Oscillation and western Pacific subtropical high (WPSH) are carried out to select climate indices. The results show that SPEI of six months time scales (SPEI-6) represents the soil moisture better than that of three and one month time scale on drought duration, severity and peaks. The key factor that influences the agriculture drought is the Ridge Point of WPSH, which mainly controls regional temperature. The SVR model incorporating climate indices, especially ridge point of WPSH, could improve the prediction accuracy compared to that solely using drought index by 4.4% in training and 5.1% in testing measured by Nash Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) for three month lead time. The improvement is more significant for the prediction with one month lead (15.8% in training and 27.0% in testing) than that with three months lead time. However, it needs to be cautious in selection of the input parameters, since adding redundant information could have a counter effect in attaining a better prediction. (c) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:710 / 720
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], GUANGDONG METEOROLOG
[2]  
[Anonymous], VALIDATION FORECAST
[3]  
[Anonymous], J GEOPHYS RES ATMOS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, DOI DOI 10.5194/hess-15-255-2011
[5]  
[Anonymous], GEOPHYS RES LETT
[6]  
[Anonymous], APPL COMPUT INTELL S
[7]  
[Anonymous], STOCH ENV RES RISK A
[8]  
[Anonymous], J ARID METEOROLOGY
[9]  
Anteneh Belayneh Anteneh Belayneh, 2013, Journal of Water and Land Development, P3
[10]  
Bhagwat P. P., 2012, Journal of Water Resource and Protection, V4, P528, DOI 10.4236/jwarp.2012.47062