The moderating roles of subjective (perceived) and objective task complexity in system use and performance

被引:20
作者
Chan, Siew H. [1 ]
Song, Qian [2 ]
Yao, Lee J.
机构
[1] Nova SE Univ, H Wayne Huizenga Coll Business & Entrepreneurship, Ft Lauderdale Davie, FL 33314 USA
[2] Rochester Inst Technol, Saunders Coll Business, Rochester, NY 14623 USA
关键词
Objective task complexity; Subjective task complexity; Task motivation; DSS motivation; DSS use; Performance; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; EXPECTANCY-VALUE THEORY; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; INFORMATION; MODEL; ONLINE; TECHNOLOGY; ACCEPTANCE; MOTIVATION; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.059
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study builds on previous research by separating the effects of subjective (perceived) and objective task complexity to examine perceived task complexity as a positive moderator of the impact of decision support system (DSS) motivation on DSS use, and objective task complexity as a positive moderator of the effect of DSS use on performance. We manipulated task motivation and task complexity, and measured perceived task complexity, task motivation, and DSS motivation. The DSS also captured actual DSS use and the essential information for deriving the performance construct. The findings suggest that individuals report increased motivation in the high than low motivation task, and high task motivation leads to increased motivation to use the DSS to perform the task. Further, the results reveal that perceived task complexity decreases in the presence of the DSS and this highlights the importance of the DSS in alleviating cognitive resources which enhances user motivation to use the DSS, resulting in increased usage of the DSS to complete the task. The findings also accentuate the pivotal role of the DSS in assisting information processing of an objectively complex task which promotes the positive effect of DSS use on performance. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 402
页数:10
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   THE WORK PREFERENCE INVENTORY - ASSESSING INTRINSIC AND EXTRINSIC MOTIVATIONAL ORIENTATIONS [J].
AMABILE, TM ;
HILL, KG ;
HENNESSEY, BA ;
TIGHE, EM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 66 (05) :950-967
[2]   The role of epistemic motivation in individuals' response to decision complexity [J].
Amit, Adi ;
Sagiv, Lilach .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2013, 121 (01) :104-117
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Models of bounded rationality: Empirically grounded economic reason
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, The adaptive decision-maker, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139173933
[5]  
Bandura A, 1997, Self -Efficacy: The Exercise of Control
[6]   A MODEL OF THE EFFECTS OF AUDIT TASK COMPLEXITY [J].
BONNER, SE .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 1994, 19 (03) :213-234
[7]   Multimodel inference - understanding AIC and BIC in model selection [J].
Burnham, KP ;
Anderson, DR .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2004, 33 (02) :261-304
[8]  
Campbell D.K., 1991, HUM PERFORM, V4, P1, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15327043HUP0401_1
[9]   TASK COMPLEXITY - A REVIEW AND ANALYSIS [J].
CAMPBELL, DJ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1988, 13 (01) :40-52
[10]   THE INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF TASK COMPLEXITY AND PARTICIPATION ON TASK-PERFORMANCE - A FIELD EXPERIMENT [J].
CAMPBELL, DJ ;
GINGRICH, KF .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1986, 38 (02) :162-180